TY - JOUR T1 - Current therapeutic trends for tinnitus cure and control – a scoping review JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.06.29.21259450 SP - 2021.06.29.21259450 AU - Vatsal Chhaya AU - Divya Patel AU - Shamik Mehta AU - Jignesh Rajvir AU - Vinodkumar Jhinjhuwadia AU - Pranshuta Sehgal AU - Kapil Khambholja Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/03/2021.06.29.21259450.abstract N2 - Background The inherent complexities of condition such as tinnitus with cause and mechanism not known, presents lack of high-level evidence to make an inference on the treatment approaches. A comprehensive review cannot be performed owing to insufficient number of trials. Hence a scoping review approach was adopted to provide a broad overview on approaches for tinnitus management.Objective To review the current evidence on prevalent treatment strategies used for tinnitus management and determine barriers and facilitators for adoption of treatment approaches in developed and developing countries.Methods The present scoping review was performed in compliance with PRISMA ScR checklist. Literature search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, google scholar and Cochrane database. Articles published between 2010-2021 mentioning therapeutic treatment strategies were included. However, therapies concentrating on symptomatic management were excluded. Evidence with highest scientific hierarchy such as systematic reviews (SRs) and randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) were considered. The context for the ScR was study-region based and included studies from high-income and low and middle-income countries (HICs, LMICs)Results A total of 20 records were included with 11 SRs and 9 RCTs. Non-pharmacological interventions demonstrated moderate efficacy, including transcranial magnetic-(TMS) and direct current stimulation (tDCS), hearing aids (combined with sound generator or alone). No specific drug found to have mode of action pertaining to target root cause due to lack of clinical knowledge. Most of the trials used the same tools for tinnitus severity.Conclusion Although several scoping reviews are published with exclusive focus on individual therapies, authors recommend umbrella review of systematic reviews to generate evidence-based practice consensus for tinnitus.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study received no funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Being a scoping review, it does not require ethics committee approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the data charted in the study is available in public domain and can be accessed using bibliography. ER -