RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Technology in Palliative Care (TIP): the identification of digital priorities for palliative care research using a modified Delphi method
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.24.21259307
DO 10.1101/2021.06.24.21259307
A1 Amara Callistus Nwosu
A1 Tamsin McGlinchey
A1 Justin Sanders
A1 Sarah Stanley
A1 Jennifer Palfrey
A1 Patrick Lubbers
A1 Laura Chapman
A1 Anne Finucane
A1 Stephen Mason
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/03/2021.06.24.21259307.abstract
AB Background Developments in digital health (describing technologies which use computing platforms, connectivity, software, and sensors for health care and related purposes) has the potential to transform the delivery of health and social care to help citizens manage their own health. Currently, we lack consensus about digital health research priorities in palliative care and lack theories about how these technologies might improve care outcomes. Global palliative care need is expected to increase due to the consequences of an ageing population; therefore, it is important for healthcare leaders to identify innovations to ensure that an increasingly frail population have appropriate access to palliative care services. Consequently, it is important to articulate research priorities as the first step to determine how we should allocate finite resources to a field saturated with rapidly developing innovations.Aims To identify research priority areas for digital health in palliative care.Methods We selected the digital health trends, most relevant to palliative care, from a list of emerging trends reported by the ‘Future Today Institute’. We conducted a modified Delphi process and consensus meeting with palliative care experts to identify research priorities. We used the views of public representatives to gain their perspectives of the agreed priorities.Results One hundred and three experts (representing 11 countries) participated in the 1st Delphi round. Fifty-five participated in the 2nd round (53% of 1st round). Eleven experts attended the final consensus meeting. We identified 16 priorities areas, which were summarised into eight themes. These themes were: big data, mobile devices, telehealth and telemedicine, virtual reality, artificial intelligence, the smart home, biotechnology and digital legacy.Conclusions The identified priorities in this paper represent a wide range of important emerging areas in field of digital health, personalised medicine, and data science. Human-centred design and robust governance systems should be considered in future research. It is important that the risks of using these technologies in palliative care are properly addressed to ensure that these tools are used meaningfully, wisely and safely and do not cause unintentional harm.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis was a Delphi study and registration on a trial database was not required. We created a webpage to provide an study information to enable people to access details of the research study.Funding StatementThis research was supported by the following funding streams: Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) Research Capability Funding (researcher salary), 20,970 GBP. Wellcome Trust, Public Engagement Grants Scheme (Public Engagement Event costs), 360 GBP. Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (consensus meeting costs) 807 GBP. The posts of ACN and SS were funded by Marie Curie: https://www.mariecurie.org.uk/Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the University of Liverpool Ethics Committee (study approval number 3564).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll study data are available from teh manuscript and supplementary files.AIArtificial IntelligenceEHRElectronic Health RecordsePROMelectronic patient-reported measuresFTIFuture Today InstituteMLMachine learningNHSNational Health ServiceNLPNatural Language ProcessingPACDPhysical Activity Change DetectionPGHDPatient-Generated Health DataPROMsPatient reported outcome measuresVRVirtual Reality