RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Moderate-Intensity Exercise Versus High-Intensity Interval Training to Recover Walking Post-Stroke: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.25.21259562
DO 10.1101/2021.06.25.21259562
A1 Allison Miller
A1 Darcy S. Reisman
A1 Sandra A. Billinger
A1 Kari Dunning
A1 Sarah Doren
A1 Jaimie Ward
A1 Henry Wright
A1 Erin Wagner
A1 Daniel Carl
A1 Myron Gerson
A1 Oluwole Awosika
A1 Jane Khoury
A1 Brett Kissela
A1 Pierce Boyne
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/02/2021.06.25.21259562.abstract
AB Background Stroke results in neurologic impairments and aerobic deconditioning that contribute to limited walking capacity which is a major barrier post-stroke. Current exercise recommendations and stroke rehabilitation guidelines recommend moderate-intensity aerobic training post-stroke. Locomotor high-intensity interval training is a promising new strategy that has shown significantly greater improvements in aerobic fitness and motor performance than moderate-intensity aerobic training in other populations. However, the relative benefits and risks of high-intensity interval training and moderate-intensity aerobic training remain poorly understood following stroke. In this study, we hypothesize that locomotor high-intensity interval training will result in greater improvements in walking capacity than moderate-intensity aerobic training.Methods Using a single-blind, 3-site randomized controlled trial, 50 chronic (>6 months) stroke survivors are randomly assigned to complete 36 locomotor training sessions of either high-intensity interval training or moderate-intensity aerobic training. Main eligibility criteria are: age 40-80 years, single stroke for which the participant received treatment (experienced 6 months to 5 years prior to consent), walking speed ≤1.0 m/s, able to walk at least 3 minutes on the treadmill at ≥ 0.13 m/s (0.3 mph), stable cardiovascular condition (American Heart Association class B), and the ability to walk 10 meters overground without continuous physical assistance. The primary outcome (walking capacity) and secondary outcomes (self-selected and fast gait speed, aerobic fitness and fatigue) are assessed prior to initiating training and after 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks of training.Discussion This study will provide fundamental new knowledge to inform the selection of intensity and duration dosing parameters for gait recovery and optimization of aerobic training interventions in chronic stroke. Data needed to justify and design a subsequent definitive trial will also be obtained. Thus, the results of this study will inform future stroke rehabilitation guidelines on how to optimally improve walking capacity following stroke.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03760016. First posted: November 30, 2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03760016Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03760016Funding StatementThis study is funded through a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01HD093694). Funding was also provided to AM from the Foundation for Physical Therapy Research Florence P. Kendall Doctoral Scholarship.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research has been approved by the University of Cincinnati IRBAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData sharing is not applicable to this article as the datasets are currently being generated and have not yet been analyzed. De-identified data will be deposited in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Data and Specimen Hub (DASH) repository.MATModerate-intensity aerobic training;HITHigh-intensity interval training;10MWT10-Meter Walk Test;6MWT6-Minute Walk Test;VO2-peakpeak oxygen uptake;UCUniversity of Cincinnati;UDUniversity of Delaware;KUMCKansas University Medical Center;MOPManual of Operating Procedures;RPERating of Perceived Exertion;GXTGraded Exercise Test;PREpre-blinded outcome testing;4-WK4-week blinded outcome testing;8-WK8-week blinded outcome testing;12-WK12-week blinded outcome testing;LEFMLower Extremity Fugl-Meyer;NIHSSNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scale;FACFunctional Ambulation Category;ABCActivities Specific Balance Confidence Scale;GROCGlobal Rating of Change;ECGelectrocardiogram;PIPrimary Investigator;HRHeart Rate;HRRHeart Rate Reserve;MCIDMinimally Clinically Important Difference;DSMBData and Safety Monitoring Board;AEAdverse Event;SAESerious Adverse Event;CTCAECommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events