TY - JOUR T1 - Heterogeneity of hypoxemia severity according to oxygenation index in COVID-19 pneumonia JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.06.23.21259421 SP - 2021.06.23.21259421 AU - Isaac Núñez AU - Adrian Soto-Mota Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/07/02/2021.06.23.21259421.abstract N2 - Objective To compare hypoxemia severity of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia that arrive at an emergency department as classified by three oxygenation indexes.Design Retrospective analysis of pulse oximeter saturation and arterial blood gas analysis obtained at arrival.Setting Tertiary referral hospital in Mexico City converted early in the pandemic to a COVID-19 center.Patients and measurements A total of 2,960 patients with suspected COVID-19 pneumonia were admitted to the emergency department from April 2020 until March 2021. Pulse oximeter saturation and arterial blood gas analysis was obtained in all of them. Pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2) to inspired oxygen fraction ratio (FiO2), oxygen saturation in arterial blood (SatO2) to FiO2 ratio, and oxygen pressure in arterial blood to FiO2 ratio were calculated for every patient.Interventions None.Main Results A strong correlation was seen between PaO2/FiO2 & SpO2/FiO2 (rho = 0.6, p < 0.001), and SatO2/FiO2 & SpO2/FiO2 (rho = 0.65, p < 0.001), while a very strong correlation was seen between PaO2/FiO2 & SatO2/FiO2 (rho = 0.88, p < 0.001). When classifying severity by quantiles, considerable cross-over was observed when comparing oxygenation indexes, as only 785 (26.5%) patients were in the same quintile across the three indexes.Conclusions Hypoxemia severity is heterogeneous according to the oxygenation index utilized. This limits their usefulness as sole markers of severity, as inter-observer variability, especially on FiO2 estimation, and different practices limit consistent follow up and treatment decisions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received for this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesCode used for the analysis is available at https://github.com/isaac-nunez/Oxygenation_indexes. ER -