PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Abdulhakim Şengel AU - Mahmut Alp Karahan AU - Nuray Altay AU - Orhan Binici AU - Veli Fahri Pehlivan AU - Ahmet Atlas TI - Comparative of the Effectiveness of Different Objective Method for Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Success; Which One of Them is A Reliable and Early Indicator? AID - 10.1101/2021.06.26.21259567 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.06.26.21259567 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/30/2021.06.26.21259567.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/30/2021.06.26.21259567.full AB - BACKGROUND Traditional methods that evaluate the success of peripheral nerve block have been replaced by methods that allow objective evaluations over time. Multiple objective techniques for peripheral nerve block have been discussed in the literature.OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate whether perfusion index (PI), non-invasive tissue hemoglobin monitoring (SpHb), tissue oxygen saturation (StO2), tissue hemoglobin index (THI) and body temperature are reliable and objective methods to evaluate the adequacy of infraclavicular blockage.DESIGN A prospective observational study.SETTING Single center, Department of Anesthesiology, Harran University Medical Faculty, Turkey, from February 2019 to December 2019.PATIENTS A total of 100 patients scheduled to undergo forearm surgery.INTERVENTION Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block (ICB) in 100 patients undergoing forearm surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES PI, SpHb, StO2, THI and Body Temperature measurements were recorded 5 min before the block procedure, right after the procedure, and until the 25th minute after the procedure at 5-min intervals. These values were compared between the blocked limbs and non-blocked limbs while being statistically compared between the successful and failed block groups.RESULTS Although there were significant differences between the groups of blocked extremity and non-blocked extremity in terms of StO2 (P = 0.001), THI (P = 0.001), PI (P = 0.001) and body temperature (P = 0.001), there was no significant difference between these groups in terms of SpHb (P > 0.05). Moreover, a significant difference was detected between the groups of successful block and failed block in terms of StO2 (P = 0.002), PI (P = 0.002) and body temperature (P = 0.005), while there was no significant difference between these groups in terms of THI (P > 0.05) and SpHb (P > 0.05).CONCLUSION StO2, PI and body temperature measurements are the simple, objective, noninvasive techniques to be used to evaluate success of block procedures. According to The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, StO2 is the specific parameter with the highest sensitivity among these parameters.TRIAL REGISTRATION ACTRN12621000588897Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialACTRN12621000588897Funding StatementThis study was supported by the Harran University scientific research projects coordination unit with no. 19094.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The name of the Ethics Committee: Ethics Committee of Harran University Faculty of Medicine ID for ethics approva: On February 14, 2019, with the decision of the ethics committee numbered 19.01.07. All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesOur data were obtained from some patients who underwent upper extremity surgery in the Orthopedics Service of Harran University Medical Faculty Hospital between 01/02/2019 and 01/12/2019, with the decision of the Harran University Ethics Committee. Data It can be obtained from Abdulhakim Şengel (ORCID: 0000-0003-0905-1018).