PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Chris Davis AU - Nicola Logan AU - Grace Tyson AU - Richard Orton AU - William Harvey AU - John Haughney AU - Jon Perkins AU - The COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium AU - Thomas P. Peacock AU - Wendy S. Barclay AU - Peter Cherepanov AU - Massimo Palmarini AU - Pablo R. Murcia AU - Arvind H. Patel AU - David L. Robertson AU - Emma C. Thomson AU - Brian J. Willett AU - on behalf of the COVID-19 DeplOyed VaccinE (DOVE) Cohort Study investigators TI - Reduced neutralisation of the Delta (B.1.617.2) SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern following vaccination AID - 10.1101/2021.06.23.21259327 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.06.23.21259327 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/28/2021.06.23.21259327.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/28/2021.06.23.21259327.full AB - Vaccines are proving to be highly effective in controlling hospitalisation and deaths associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection but the emergence of viral variants with novel antigenic profiles threatens to diminish their efficacy. Assessment of the ability of sera from vaccine recipients to neutralise SARS-CoV-2 variants will inform the success of strategies for minimising COVID19 cases and the design of effective antigenic formulations. Here, we examine the sensitivity of variants of concern (VOCs) representative of the B.1.617.1 and B.1.617.2 (first associated with infections in India) and B.1.351 (first associated with infection in South Africa) lineages of SARS-CoV-2 to neutralisation by sera from individuals vaccinated with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) and ChAdOx1 (Oxford/AstraZeneca) vaccines. Across all vaccinated individuals, the spike glycoproteins from B.1.617.1 and B.1.617.2 conferred reductions in neutralisation of 4.31 and 5.11-fold respectively. The reduction seen with the B.1.617.2 lineage approached that conferred by the glycoprotein from B.1.351 (South African) variant (6.29-fold reduction) that is known to be associated with reduced vaccine efficacy. Neutralising antibody titres elicited by vaccination with two doses of BNT162b2 were significantly higher than those elicited by vaccination with two doses of ChAdOx1. Fold decreases in the magnitude of neutralisation titre following two doses of BNT162b2, conferred reductions in titre of 7.77, 11.30 and 9.56-fold respectively to B.1.617.1, B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 pseudoviruses, the reduction in neutralisation of the delta variant B.1.617.2 surpassing that of B.1.351. Fold changes in those vaccinated with two doses of ChAdOx1 were 0.69, 4.01 and 1.48 respectively. The accumulation of mutations in these VOCs, and others, demonstrate the quantifiable risk of antigenic drift and subsequent reduction in vaccine efficacy. Accordingly, booster vaccines based on updated variants are likely to be required over time to prevent productive infection. This study also suggests that two dose regimes of vaccine are required for maximal BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1-induced immunity.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementCOVID-19 DeplOyed VaccinE (DOVE) is funded by the Medical Research Council core award (MC UU 1201412). We acknowledge the support of the G2P-UK National Virology Consortium (MR/W005611/1) funded by the UKRI. COG-UK is supported by funding from the Medical Research Council (MRC) part of UK Research & Innovation (UKRI), the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and Genome Research Limited, operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute. DLR and RO are funded by the MRC (MC_UU_12014/12). WTH is funded by the MRC (MR/R024758/1). NL and BJW were funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC, BB/R004250/1), GT was funded by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC, BB/R019843/1).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the North-West Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (REC reference 21/NW/0073).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll sequence data and metadata used in this work is shared via: The COG-UK website : https://www.cogconsortium.uk/data/ GISAID: https://www.gisaid.org/. All other source data will be made available upon the University of Glasgow Enlighten open-access research data server at http://researchdata.gla.ac.uk.