RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Body mass index and subfertility: multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization analyses in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.21.21259264
DO 10.1101/2021.06.21.21259264
A1 Álvaro Hernáez
A1 Tormod Rogne
A1 Karoline H. Skåra
A1 Siri E. Håberg
A1 Christian M. Page
A1 Abigail Fraser
A1 Stephen Burgess
A1 Deborah A. Lawlor
A1 Maria Christine Magnus
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/25/2021.06.21.21259264.abstract
AB Background Higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with subfertility in women and men. This relationship is further substantiated by a few small randomized-controlled trials of weight reduction and success of assisted reproduction. The aim of the current study was to expand the current evidence-base by investigating the association between BMI and subfertility in men and women using multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization.Methods and findings We studied 34,157 women (average age 30, average BMI 23.1 kg/m2) and 31,496 men (average age 33, average BMI 25.4 kg/m2) who were genotyped and are participating in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study. Self-reported information was available on time-to-pregnancy and BMI. A total of 10% of couples were subfertile (time-to-pregnancy ≥12 months). Our findings support a J-shaped association between BMI and subfertility in both sexes using multivariable logistic regression models. Non-linear Mendelian randomization validated this relationship. A 1 kg/m2 greater genetically predicted BMI was linked to 15% greater odds of subfertility (95% confidence interval 4% to 28%) in obese women (≥30.0 kg/m2) and 14% lower odds of subfertility (−25% to -3%) in women with BMI <20.0 kg/m2. A 1 kg/m2 higher genetically predicted BMI was linked to 23% greater odds of subfertility (6% to 43%) among obese men and 36% decreased odds (−62% to 7%) among men BMI <20.0 kg/m2. A genetically predicted BMI of 23 and 25 kg/m2 was linked to the lowest subfertility risk in women and men, respectively. The main limitations of our study were that we did not know whether the subfertility was driven by the woman, man, or both; the exclusive consideration of individuals of northern European ancestry; and the limited amount of participants with obesity or BMI values <20.0 kg/m2.Conclusions We observed a J-shaped relationship between BMI and subfertility in both sexes, when using both a standard multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization analysis, further supporting a potential causal role of BMI on subfertility.WHY WAS THIS STUDY DONE?Higher body mass index (BMI) in both women and men is associated with subfertility in in observational studies. A few small randomized-controlled trials of weight reduction have reported an increased success of assisted reproduction in women. In addition, women with BMI <18.5 kg/m2 have lower conception rates with assisted reproduction technologies. A non-linear relationship between BMI and subfertility is suggested.We aimed to investigate the association between BMI and subfertility using both a standard multivariable regression and a Mendelian randomization approach.WHAT DID THE RESEARCHERS DO AND FIND?We examined the relationship between BMI and subfertility (time-to-pregnancy ≥12 months) among all men and women in the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study with available genotype information and anthropometric data (34,157 women, 31,496 men).We observed a J-shaped relationship between BMI and subfertility in both sexes, when using both a standard multivariable regression and Mendelian randomization analysis.WHAT DO THESE FINDINGS MEAN?Together with previous observational and trial evidence, findings support a causal effect of overweight/obesity on subfertility in women and men.Our findings expand the current evidence by also indicating that individuals at the lower end of the BMI distribution (<20 kg/m2) may have an increased risk of subfertility.Current advice and support for overweight and obese subfertile couples to lose weight should continue. Additionally, clinicians should consider appropriate advice to those with low BMI on whether they should increase weight to obtain a normal BMI.Competing Interest StatementD.A.L. receives (or has received in the last 10 years) research support from National and International government and charitable bodies, Roche Diagnostics and Medtronic for research unrelated to the current work. The rest of the authors declare that no competing interests exist.Funding StatementThe MoBa Cohort Study is supported by the Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services and the Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research. This project received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 947684). This work was also partly supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project number 262700. Open Access funding was provided by the Folkehelseinstituttet/Norwegian Institute of Public Health. D.A.L. is a UK National Institute for Health Research Senior Investigator (NF-SI-0611-10196) and is supported by the US National Institutes of Health (R01 DK10324) and a European Research Council Advanced Grant (DevelopObese; 669545). The funders had no role in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the article for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The MoBa cohort is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki for Medical Research involving Human Subjects. The data collection in MoBa is approved by the Norwegian Data Inspectorate. Participants provided a written informed consent before joining the cohort. This project was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics of South/East Norway (reference: 2017/1362).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe consent given by the participants does not open for storage of data on an individual level in repositories or journals. Researchers who want access to data sets for replication should submit an application to datatilgang@fhi.no. Access to data sets requires approval from the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics in Norway and an agreement with MoBa. Source data of the GWAS on BMI (Yengo L et al., Hum Mol Genet, 2018) are available in the GIANT Consortium website (https://portals.broadinstitute.org/collaboration/giant/index.php/GIANT_consortium_data_files#GWAS_Anthropometric_2015_BMI_Summary_Statistics). Source data of the GWAS on education years (Lee JJ et al., Nat Genet, 2018) are available in the Supplemental Tables of the article (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0147-3#Sec34). Finally, source data of the GWAS on smoking initiation (Liu M et al., Nat Genet, 2019) are available in the Supplemental Tables of the article (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41588-018-0307-5#Sec14).ARTassisted reproductive technologyBMIbody mass indexGRSgenetic risk scoreGWASgenome-wide association studyMRMendelian randomizationMoBathe Norwegian Mother, Father, and Child cohort studyORodds ratioSNPsingle nucleotide polymorphism