TY - JOUR T1 - The development and usability testing of two arts-based knowledge translation tools for pediatric procedural pain JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.06.17.21259118 SP - 2021.06.17.21259118 AU - Anne Le AU - Lisa Hartling AU - Shannon D. Scott Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/22/2021.06.17.21259118.abstract N2 - Procedures carried out in acute care settings, such as emergency departments (EDs), are among the most common sources of acute pain experienced by children. Such procedures may include intravenous insertions (IVs), venipuncture, and wound irrigation and repair. Inadequately managed procedural pain can cause negative short-term and long-term implications for children, ranging from anxiety to aversion to healthcare. Parents have repeatedly expressed that they do not have the necessary tools to comfort or distract their child during uncomfortable medical procedures. As such, the purpose of this study was to work with parents to develop and evaluate two digital tools for pediatric procedural pain.A whiteboard animation video and interactive infographic were developed following a systematic review and interview with parents. Prototypes were tested in five ED waiting rooms in two Canadian provinces. Sites included those in urban, rural, and remote settings. Overall, parents rated the tools highly, suggesting that engaging with parents to develop arts-based digital tools is a highly effective method in ensuring that parents can understand and utilize complex health information.Author Contributions This study was conducted under the supervision of Drs. Shannon D. Scott (SDS) and Lisa Hartling (LH), PIs for translation Evidence in Child Health to enhance Outcomes (ECHO) Research and the Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence (ARCHE), respectively. Both PIs designed the research study and obtained research funding through Translating Emergency Knowledge for Kids (TREKK) Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada (NCE).SDS designed and supervised all aspects of tool development and evaluation.LH co-designed and supervised the qualitative study involving interviews with parents and systematic review of parent experiences and information needs.Tony An developed the infographic.Kassi Shave conducted and analyzed qualitative interviews with parents.Anne Le (AL) conducted usability testing.AL analyzed usability data.All authors contributed to the writing of this technical report and provided substantial feedback.This work was funded by:Networks of Centres of ExcellenceKlassen, T., Hartling, L., Jabbour, M., Johnson, D., & Scott, S.D. (2015). Translating emergency knowledge for kids (TREKK). Networks of Centres of Excellence of Canada Knowledge Mobilization Renewal ($1,200,000). January 2016 – December 2019.Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (WCHRI)Scott, S.D & Hartling L. (2016). Translating Emergency Knowledge for Kids renewal. Women and Children’s Health Research Institute (matched dollars, $150,000). April 2016 – December 2019.This report should be cited as Le, A., Hartling, L., Scott, S.D. (2021). The development and usability testing of two arts-based knowledge translation tools for pediatric procedural pain. Technical Report. ECHO Research, University of Alberta.Available at: http://www.echokt.ca/research/technical-reports/Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Networks of Centres of Excellence and the Women and Children's Health Research InstituteAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Alberta Research Ethics BoardAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData from this project are stored on secured servers at the University of Alberta. Due to privacy and confidentiality agreements, they are not available for viewing or use by individuals outside the study team ER -