PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Clarissa Giebel AU - Kerry Hanna AU - Jacqueline Cannon AU - Justine Shenton AU - Stephen Mason AU - Hilary Tetlow AU - Paul Marlow AU - Manoj Rajagopal AU - Mark Gabbay TI - Working in a care home during the COVID-19 pandemic: How has the pandemic changed working practices? AID - 10.1101/2021.06.10.21258611 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.06.10.21258611 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/18/2021.06.10.21258611.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/18/2021.06.10.21258611.full AB - The aim of this research was to explore the impact of COVID-19 on the working practices of care home staff, caring for people living with dementia. Remote qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with care home staff caring for people living with dementia (PLWD) in the UK. Participants were recruited to the larger programme of research via convenience sampling. Interviews were conducted via telephone or online platforms. This research employed inductive thematic analysis. Sixteen care home staff were included in this study. Three overarching themes were developed from the analysis that conveyed changes to the everyday working practices of the care home workforce and the impact such changes posed to staff wellbeing: (1) Practical implications of working in a care home during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2); Staff values and changes to the staff roles (3): Impact to the care home staff and concerns for the care sector. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted the daily working practices of care home staff, with staff forced to adopt additional roles on top of increased workloads to compensate for the loss of external agencies and support. Support and guidance must be offered urgently to inform care home staff on how to best adapt to their new working practices, ensuring that they are adequately trained.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis research is supported by a grant awarded to the authors by the Geoffrey and Pauline Martin Trust. Authors CG and MG are part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC). The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Institute for Health Research or the Department of Health and Social Care.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained through the University of Liverpool ethics committee. An approved participant information sheet was emailed to the participants, and re-read to the participants, prior to taking consent. Verbal informed consent was taken before the interview commenced, which was also audio-recorded, as per the approved ethical protocolAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the author [CG]. The data are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions.