RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Relative perceived importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 acquisition in England and Wales: Analysis of the Virus Watch Community Cohort
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.11.21258730
DO 10.1101/2021.06.11.21258730
A1 Sarah Beale
A1 Thomas Byrne
A1 Ellen Fragaszy
A1 Jana Kovar
A1 Vincent Nguyen
A1 Anna Aryee
A1 Wing Lam Erica Fong
A1 Cyril Geismar
A1 Parth Patel
A1 Madhumita Shrotri
A1 Nicholas Patni
A1 Isobel Braithwaite
A1 Annalan M D Navaratnam
A1 Robert W Aldridge
A1 Andrew Hayward
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/16/2021.06.11.21258730.abstract
AB We aimed to assess the relative importance of different settings for SARS-CoV2 transmission in a large community cohort. We demonstrate the importance of home, work and education as venues for transmission. In children, education was most important and in older adults essential shopping was of high importance. Our findings support public health messaging about infection control at home, advice on working from home and restrictions in different venues.Competing Interest StatementACH serves on the UK New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group.Funding Statement The research costs for the study have been supported by the MRC Grant Ref: MC_PC 19070 awarded to UCL on 30 March 2020 and MRC Grant Ref: MR/V028375/1 awarded on 17 August 2020. The study also received $15,000 of Facebook advertising credit to support a pilot social media recruitment campaign on 18th August 2020. This study was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Wellcome Clinical Research Career Development Fellowship to RA [206602] and a Clinical PhD Fellowship to AA [206441/Z/17/Z]. SB and TB are supported by an MRC doctoral studentship (MR/N013867/1). Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Virus Watch study has been approved by the Hampstead NHS Health Research Authority Ethics Committee. Ethics approval number - 20/HRA/2320.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesWe aim to share aggregate data from this project on our website and via a "Findings so far" section on our website - https://ucl-virus-watch.net/. We will also be sharing individual record-level data on a research data-sharing service such as the Office of National Statistics Secure Research Service. In sharing the data we will work within the principles set out in the UKRI Guidance on best practice in the management of research data. Access to use of the data whilst research is being conducted will be managed by the Chief Investigators (ACH and RWA) in accordance with the principles set out in the UKRI guidance on best practice in the management of research data. We will put analysis code on publicly available repositories to enable their reuse.