TY - JOUR T1 - Impacts of COVID-19 on long-term health and health care use JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.02.16.21251807 SP - 2021.02.16.21251807 AU - Katrine Skyrud AU - Kjersti Helene Hernæs AU - Kjetil Telle AU - Karin Magnusson Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/15/2021.02.16.21251807.abstract N2 - Aim To explore the temporal impact of mild COVID-19 on need for primary and specialist health care services.Methods In all persons tested for SARS-CoV-2 in Norway March 1st 2020 to February 1st 2021 (N=1 401 922), we contrasted the monthly all-cause health care use before and up to 6 months after the test (% relative difference), for patients with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 (non-hospitalization, i.e. mild COVID-19) and patients with a negative test (no COVID-19).Results We found a substantial short-term elevation in primary care use in all age groups, with men generally having a higher relative increase (men 20-44 years: 522%, 95%CI=509-535, 45-69 years: 439%, 95%CI=426-452, ≥ 70 years: 199%, 95%CI=180-218) than women (20-44 years: 342, 95%CI=334-350, 45-69 years=375, 95%CI=365-385, ≥ 70 years: 156%, 95%CI=141-171) at 1 month following positive test. At 2 months, this sex difference was less pronounced, with a (20-44 years: 21%, 95%CI=13-29, 45-69 years=38%, 95%CI=30-46, ≥ 70 years: 15%, 95%CI=3-28) increase in primary care use for men, and a (20-44 years: 30%, 95%CI=24-36, 45-69 years=57%, 95%CI=50-64, ≥ 70 years: 14%, 95%CI=4-24) increase for women. At 3 months after test, only women aged 45-70 years still had an increased primary care use (14%, 95%CI=7-20). The increase was due to respiratory- and general/unspecified conditions. We observed no long-term (4-6 months) elevation in primary care use, and no elevation in specialist care use.Conclusion Mild COVID-19 gives an elevated need for primary care that vanishes 2-3 months after positive test. Middle-aged women had the most prolonged increased primary care use.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe study was funded by the Norwegian Institute of Public Health. No external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional board review was conducted, and The Ethics Committee of South-East Norway confirmed (June 4th 2020, #153204) that external ethical board review was not required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData are not publicly available ER -