TY - JOUR T1 - A systematic review assessing the potential for release of vector species from competition following insecticide-based population suppression of <em>Anopheles</em> species in Africa JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.06.09.21258627 SP - 2021.06.09.21258627 AU - Alima Qureshi AU - John B. Connolly Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/13/2021.06.09.21258627.abstract N2 - Background While insecticide-based vector control can effectively target vector species in areas of high malaria endemicity, such as Anopheles gambiae in Africa, residual disease transmission can occur. Understanding the potential role of competitive displacement between vector species could inform both current insecticide-based vector control programmes and the development of future complementary interventions.Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify studies of insecticide-based vector control of Anopheles species in Africa that reported indices for absolute densities of vector species. After screening against inclusion, exclusion and risk of bias criteria, studies were assigned to three categories based on whether they showed population density changes involving decreases in two or more vector species (D), increases in two or more vector species (I), or increases in one vector species concomitant with decreases in another vector species (ID). Category ID studies could thus provide evidence consistent with the release of vector species from competition following the insecticide-based population suppression of Anopheles species.Results Of 5,569 papers identified in searches, 30 were selected for quantitative and qualitative analysis. Nineteen studies were assigned to category D and 1 study to category I. Ten studies categorised as ID provided evidence ranging from weak to persuasive that release from competition could have contributed to changes in species composition. Category ID showed no statistical differences from category D for reductions in malaria transmission and levels of insecticide resistance, but did so for insecticide type, pyrethroids being associated with category ID. A qualitative assessment identified 5 studies that provided the most convincing evidence that release from competition could have contributed to changes in species composition.Conclusion This review identified evidence that insecticide-based reductions in the density of Anopheles species in Africa could facilitate the release of other vector species from competition. While it remains uncertain whether this evidence is representative of most entomological sequelae from the use insecticide-based vector control in the field, 5 studies provided persuasive evidence that insecticide use could lead, at least under some circumstances, to competitive release of non-targeted vector species. These results should inform current and future integrated vector management approaches to malaria control.Competing Interest StatementBoth authors are part of the Target Malaria not-for-profit research consortium, which aims to develop novel malaria vector control tools that complement existing insecticide-based vector control interventions. JBC is an employee of Imperial College London, whose role for the Target Malaria not-for-profit research consortium is funded by Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, and who has received travel grants from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health. AQ is an employee of Imperial College London, whose role is funded by the Open Philanthropy Project Fund, an advised fund of Silicon Valley Community Foundation.Funding StatementBoth authors are part of the Target Malaria not-for-profit research consortium, which aims to develop novel malaria vector control tools that complement existing insecticide-based vector control interventions. JBC is an employee of Imperial College London, whose role for the Target Malaria not-for-profit research consortium is funded by Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation, and who has received travel grants from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health. AQ is an employee of Imperial College London, whose role is funded by the Open Philanthropy Project Fund, an advised fund of Silicon Valley Community Foundation.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a systematic review of the literature and did not require IRB or ethics committee oversightAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data and material is presented in the manuscript and supplementary material.Abbreviationsbmnbites per man per nightbpnbites per person per nightfhnfemales per house per nightCategory Ddensity of all species decreased with use of insecticide-based vector controlCategory Idensity of all species increased with use of insecticide-based vector controlCategory IDdensity of one or more vector species increased while the density of another one or more species decreased with use of insecticide-based vector controlHLCHuman landing catchIRSIndoor residual sprayingITNinsecticide-treated bednetLLINlong-lasting insecticide-treated bednetLTClight trap collectionPSCpyrethrum spray catchUTNuntreated bednet ER -