TY - JOUR T1 - Prescribed footwear and orthoses are not prophylactic in preventing lower extremity injuries in military tactical athletes. A systematic review with meta-analysis JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.06.07.21258508 SP - 2021.06.07.21258508 AU - Scott L. Paradise AU - Joshua R. Beer AU - Chris A. Cruz AU - Ken M. Fechner AU - Andrew J. MacGregor AU - John J. Fraser Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/11/2021.06.07.21258508.abstract N2 - Introduction Military members are exposed to high cumulative physical loads that frequently lead to injury. Prescribed footwear and orthoses have been used to prevent injury. The purpose of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to assess if prescribed prophylactic footwear or foot orthoses reduced lower extremity injury risk in military tactical athletes.Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, SportDiscus, and DTIC databases were searched for randomized controlled trials published at any time that compared foot orthoses or prescribed footwear (to include shock-absorbing insoles and socks) to a placebo intervention or a no-treatment control. Methodological quality was assessed and numbers of injuries, population at risk, and the duration of the study epoch were extracted and relative risk (RR) calculated. An omnibus meta-analysis was performed assessing all prescribed footwear and orthoses intervention studies, with subgroup analyses conducted on studies with similar interventions [i.e., basketball athletic shoes; athletic shoes (prescribed by foot type); foot orthoses; shock-absorbing insoles; socks; tropical combat boots].Results Of 1,673 studies identified, 22 studies were included. Three of eight studies that employed orthoses demonstrated significantly reduced overuse injuries compared to no treatment controls (RR range: 0.34-0.68); one study showed neoprene insoles significantly decreased overuse injuries (RR: 0.75). There were no other significant effects in the individual studies, and no protective effects observed in the omnibus meta-analysis or in the component sub analyses.Conclusions Prescribed footwear and orthoses do not appear to have a prophylactic effect on lower quarter MSKI in military members and cannot be recommended at this time.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical Protocols http://bit.ly/CRD42020183403 Funding StatementNo external funding was received for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was not required for this systematic review and meta-analyis.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. ER -