RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Interventions to treat post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in vulnerably housed populations and trauma-informed care: A scoping review JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.06.07.21258494 DO 10.1101/2021.06.07.21258494 A1 Alexandria Bennett A1 Kien Crosse A1 Michael Ku A1 Nicole E. Edgar A1 Amanda Hodgson A1 Simon Hatcher YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/09/2021.06.07.21258494.abstract AB Objectives The goals of this study are to identify and analyse interventions that aim to treat Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and complex PTSD in individuals who are vulnerably housed and to describe how these treatments have been delivered using trauma-informed care.Design Scoping reviewSearch strategy We searched electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and PTSDpubs for published literature up to March 2020 for any studies that examined the treatment of PTSD in adults who were vulnerably housed. Websites of relevant organizations and other grey literature sources were searched to supplement the electronic database search. The characteristics and effect of the interventions were analyzed. We also explored how the interventions were delivered and the elements of trauma-informed care that were described.Results 26 studies were included. We identified four types of interventions: (1) trauma focused psychotherapies; (2) non-trauma psychotherapies; (3) housing interventions; and (4) pharmacotherapies. The trauma-informed interventions were small case series and the non-trauma focused therapies included four randomized controlled trials, were generally ineffective. Of the ten studies which described trauma-informed care the most commonly named elements were physical and emotional safety, the experience of feeling heard and understood, and flexibility of choice. The literature also commented on the difficulty of providing care to this population including lack of private space to deliver therapy; the co-occurrence of substance use; and barriers to follow-up including limited length of stay in different shelters and high staff turnover.Conclusions This scoping review identified a lack of high-quality trials to address PTSD in the vulnerably housed. There is a need to conduct well designed trials that take into account the unique setting of this population and which describe those elements of trauma-informed care that are most important and necessary.Strengths and limitations of this studyFirst review of how trauma-informed care is being operationalized in the treatment of PTSD for the vulnerably housed.Provides a clear picture emphasizing the need to consistently utilize a trauma-informed care approach for PTSD treatment in the vulnerably housed.Largely homogenous populations (primarily women and US Veterans) included in studies, may not be representative of broader population.Often no mention of ethnic or cultural factors to consider when providing treatment.Many of the studies available were of low methodological quality.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis is not a clinical trial. However, the scoping review protocol has been registered with the Open Science Framework, see: https://osf.io/mpjgnClinical Protocols https://osf.io/mpjgn Funding StatementThis research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Catalyst Grant Program - Strategy for Patient Oriented Research (SPOR). Funding Reference Number 169392.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/A, scoping review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplemental information.