PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Justina F. Avila
AU  - Indira C. Turney
AU  - Precious Esie
AU  - Jet M. J. Vonk
AU  - Vanessa R. Weir
AU  - Daniel W. Belsky
AU  - Jennifer J. Manly
TI  - Socioeconomic Status, Biological Aging, and Memory in a Diverse National Sample of Older US Men and Women
AID  - 10.1101/2021.06.04.21258370
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.06.04.21258370
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/07/2021.06.04.21258370.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/07/2021.06.04.21258370.full
AB  - Importance Exposure to socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with rapid cognitive aging. Biological aging, the progressive loss of system integrity that occurs as we age is proposed as a modifiable process mediating this health inequality.Objective To test the hypothesis that socioeconomic disparities in cognitive aging in older adults is explained by accelerated biological aging.Design Observational cohort study.Setting U.S. Health and Retirement Study DNA-methylation sub-study.Participants N=3,648 (49% male) adults aged 50-100 (M=70, SD=10) with DNA methylation data.Exposures Socioeconomic status (SES) was measured from years of education and household wealth. The extent and pace of biological aging were quantified using three DNA-methylation measures: PhenoAge, GrimAge, and DunedinPoAm.Main Outcomes and Measures Cognitive aging was measured from repeated longitudinal assessments of immediate and delayed word recall. Latent growth curve modeling estimated participants’ level of memory performance and rate of decline over 2-11 follow-up assessments spanning 2-20 years. Models were estimated to assess whether the relationship between SES and memory trajectories was mediated by biological aging.Results Older adults with lower SES had lower memory performance, faster decline and exhibited accelerated biological aging (SES β=.33, 99% CI[.30-.36], biological-aging measure effect size associations ranged from .08 to .20). Accelerated biological aging was associated with decreased memory performance and faster memory decline (effect-size range .03 to .18). Higher SES was associated with slower biological aging for White and Black men and women, but not Latinx participants. The relationship between biological aging measures and memory was weaker for Black and Latinx participants compared with White people. In mediation analysis, biological aging accounted for 3-9% of the SES-memory gradient in White participants. There was no evidence of mediation in Black or Latinx participants.Conclusions and Relevance Among a national sample of older adults, DNA-methylation measures of biological aging were associated with memory trajectories in White, but not Black or Latinx older adults. These results challenge the assumption that DNA-methylation biomarkers of aging that were developed in primarily White people can quantify aging processes affecting cognition in Black and Latinx older adults.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe HRS (Health and Retirement Study) is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740) and is conducted by the University of Michigan. We acknowledge the HRS study participants and the HRS research and support staff for their contributions to this study. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Jennifer Manly had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Health and Retirement Study (HRS) was approved by Institutional Review Boards at University of Michigan Health Sciences/Behavioral Sciences.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesHealth and Retirement Study, ([RAND Longitudinal]) public use dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann Arbor, MI, (2016). Health and Retirement Study, ([Epigenetic Clocks]) public use dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann Arbor, MI, (2016).