RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Clinical performance of two EUA-approved anti-COVID-19 IgG/IgM rapid lateral flow immunoassays using whole blood finger-sticks
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.06.04.21258189
DO 10.1101/2021.06.04.21258189
A1 Tagwerker, Christian
A1 Baig, Irfan
A1 Brunson, Eric J.
A1 Mundo, Kristine
A1 Dutra-Smith, Davan
A1 Carias-Marines, Mary Jane
A1 de Zoysa, Ranulu Samanthi
A1 Smith, David J.
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/05/2021.06.04.21258189.abstract
AB Serological, or antibody, tests detect immunoglobulins produced by the hosts plasma B cells following exposure to foreign antigens. Venipuncture blood draws to collect human venous whole blood, plasma from anticoagulated blood (Li+ heparin, K2EDTA and sodium citrate), or serum are commonly utilized and require refrigerated temperatures during transport to the testing facility. Subsequent laboratory testing by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) or chemiluminescence immunoassays (CLIA) can take an additional 2-5 hours. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) to be used in point-of-care (POC) and remote settings have become essential during mandatory quarantine and isolation periods. RDTs allowed for more cost-effective testing using less collection materials with an immediate (5-10 minutes) test result. However, the majority of emerging RDTs receiving Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for qualitative detection and differentiation of IgM and IgG antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 were only approved for use in human venous whole blood, plasma or serum. In this study we summarize performance characteristics of one RDT (COVID-19 IgG/IgM lateral flow immunoassay rapid cassette) to another by simultaneous application of whole blood finger-stick specimens (n = 32). The study was performed over 5 different days, with daily quality controls consisting of serum previously verified to be positive or negative by COVID-19 IgG/IgM ELISA testing.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe authors received no specific funding for this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Alcala Pharmaceutical Inc. Institutional Review Board (IORG0010127) in consideration of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki). All collection activities occurred at the phlebotomy collection site at Alcala Testing and Analysis Services, 3703 Camino del Rio South, San Diego, CA, 92108 by certified phlebotomists. Whole blood specimen rapid cassette testing was conducted from 08/14/2020 to 08/26/2020 at Alcala Testing and Analysis Services. All subjects were recruited via phone or e-mail announcements with phone follow-up or by word of mouth at the San Diego Comprehensive Pain Management Clinic, 3703 Camino del Rio South, San Diego, CA, 92108. Healthcare workers from the clinic also volunteered. Healthcare workers or volunteers in any setting could enroll without a prior COVID-19 test. All specimens derived from human subjects were de-identified of their health information as defined by Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) guidelines. Thirty-two volunteers took part in a whole blood finger-stick collection with simultaneous application of the specimen to the Healgen or LYHER COVID-19 IgG and IgM antibody rapid cassette. Deidentified serum (SST tiger top tube) specimens previously confirmed by the EDI Novel Coronavirus COVID-19 IgG/IgM ELISA test procedure were used as quality controls.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data related to this study is contained within the manuscript and all volunteer data has been deidentified as per HIPAA guidelines.