TY - JOUR T1 - Physical body experiences questionnaire simplified for active aging (PBE-QAG): Validation with Rasch measurement theory JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.06.01.21258192 SP - 2021.06.01.21258192 AU - Wei Deng AU - Sydney Carpentier AU - Ann Van de Winckel Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/04/2021.06.01.21258192.abstract N2 - Purpose To validate the Physical body experiences questionnaire simplified for active aging (PBE-QAG) with Rasch measurement theory. PBE-QAG measures body awareness during physical activity and includes dimensions of body-mind relationship, body acceptance, and awareness of physical skills and limits.Methods Adults without pain (n=269), with pain (n=61), with mental health conditions (n=200), and with stroke (n=36) were recruited at the Minnesota State Fair, Highland Fest, and in the Brain Body Mind Lab (University of Minnesota) and completed demographic and clinical questionnaires as well as the PBE-QAG. The PBE-QAG has 12 items, with scores ranging between 0 (totally true) to 4 (totally false). A low total score on the PBE-QAG reflects better body awareness. We evaluated item and person fit, targeting, unidimensionality, person separation reliability (PSR), local item dependence (LID), and differential item functioning (DIF) for demographic and clinical characteristics. We compared with Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA the person mean location in four groups: Adults with or without mental health conditions; and whether those groups did body awareness training.Results Unidimensionality and item fit were obtained after deleting 2 and rescoring 5 items. Seven participants did not fit the model (1.23%). There was minimal floor (5.72%), no ceiling effect (0.00%), and no LID. No DIF was greater than 0.50 logits for any of the variables. The Wright-corrected PSR was 0.96. The person mean location was -1.71±1.21 logits. Adults with mental health conditions who did not practice body awareness had a higher person mean location [Median (IQR)=0.83(0.89) logits, p<0.0001] versus the other three groups, reflecting lower body awareness.Conclusions PBE-QAG demonstrated good item and person fit, but the targeting is off. Therefore, the current version of PBE-QAG is not recommended for use in the general population. We encourage further validation of PBE-QAG in adults with mental health conditions who do not practice body awareness.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe research was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (National Institutes of Health), grant UL1TR002494. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (National Institutes of Health). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study was approved by the University of Minnesota's Institutional Review Board (IRB# STUDY00005849 and STUDY00000821) and the study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe raw data are deposited in the repository DRUM (University Digital Conservancy). https://doi.org/10.13020/e6e1-as21 DIFDifferential Item FunctioningLIDLocal Item DependencePBE-QAGPhysical Body Experiences Questionnaire Simplified for Active AgingPCARPrincipal Components Analysis of ResidualsPSRPerson Separation ReliabilityRUMM2030Rasch Unidimensional Measurement Model 2030 software ER -