PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kris V Parag
AU  - Robin N Thompson
AU  - Christl A Donnelly
TI  - Are epidemic growth rates more informative than reproduction numbers?
AID  - 10.1101/2021.04.15.21255565
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.04.15.21255565
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/04/2021.04.15.21255565.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/04/2021.04.15.21255565.full
AB  - Summary statistics, often derived from simplified models of epidemic spread, inform public health policy in real time. The instantaneous reproduction number, Rt, is predominant among these statistics, measuring the average ability of an infection to multiply. However, Rt encodes no temporal information and is sensitive to modelling assumptions. Consequently, some have proposed the epidemic growth rate, rt, i.e., the rate of change of the log-transformed case incidence, as a more temporally meaningful and model-agnostic policy guide. We examine this assertion, identifying if and when estimates of rt are more informative than those of Rt. We assess their relative strengths both for learning about pathogen transmission mechanisms and for guiding public health interventions in real time.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementUK Medical Research Council (MRC) and Department for International Development (DFID), Grant Number: MR/R015600/1; UK National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections in partnership with Public Health England (PHE), Grant Number: HPRU200907. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:N/AAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThis paper generates no data.