PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Kolahi, Jafar AU - Khazaei, Saber AU - Iranmanesh, Pedram TI - Science Map of the Highly Tweeted Endodontic Articles AID - 10.1101/2020.03.29.20046755 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2020.03.29.20046755 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/03/2020.03.29.20046755.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/03/2020.03.29.20046755.full AB - Introduction To identify active journals, authors, institutions and hot topics in the field of Endodontics within the Twittersphere.Methods On December 23, 2019, the Altmetric database was searched using the titles of 11 endodontic journals. The bibliometric data of the top 5% of endodontic articles with the highest tweets number were extracted from the Web of Science and analyzed.Results Overall, 3,918 tweets (from 3,881 individual posts) related to endodontic articles from seven journals were identified, which were mostly from the U.S. The Journal of Endodontics received the most tweets. Systematic review and apical periodontitis were the most popular keywords. At the author level, Dummer PMH and Patel S and at institution level King’s College London and Cardiff University, had the largest number of popular articles in the Twittersphere. The number of tweets was not correlated with citations (r=0.007, P=0.929). No statistically significant differences were found between open access (n=41, Mean=11.19) and non-open access (n=136, Mean=9.38) articles regarding the number of tweets (P=0.648).Conclusions In the ‘Twittersphere’, the overall activity of endodontic journals and associations were low. They could be more active and increase their visibility and social impact by immediately sharing research outcomes and communicating with peers, practitioners, and patients.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was not financially supported by any institution or commercial sources and the authors declare that they have no competing interests.Author DeclarationsAll relevant ethical guidelines have been followed; any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained and details of the IRB/oversight body are included in the manuscript.YesAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is avaiable