RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Covid-19: Comparisons by Country and Implications for Future Pandemics
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.29.21258056
DO 10.1101/2021.05.29.21258056
A1 Bangor Lewis Mehl-Madrona
A1 Maine Orono
A1 François Bricaire
A1 Adrian Cuyugan
A1 Jovan Barac
A1 Asadullah Parvaiz
A1 Ali Bin Jamil
A1 Sajid Iqbal
A1 Ryan Vally
A1 Meryem Koliali
A1 Mohamed Karim Sellier
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/06/01/2021.05.29.21258056.abstract
AB Background We set out in this paper to compare Covid-19 results by country to better understand the factors leading to the differing results found internationally.Methods We used publicly available large datasets to explore differences by country for Covid-19 mortality statistics. We continuously challenged our projections with reality and numbers from countries around the world, allowing us to refine our models and better understand the progression of the epidemic. All our predictions and findings were discussed and validated from a clinical viewpoint.Results While no lockdown resulted in higher mortality, the difference between strict lockdown and lax lockdown was not terribly different and favored lax lockdown. Only one of the top 44 countries had long and strict restrictions. Strict restrictions were more common in the worst performing countries in terms of Covid mortality. The United States had both the largest economic growth coupled with the largest rate of mortality. Those who did well economically, had lower mortality and less pressure on their population. Yet they had less mortality than average and less than their neighbors.Conclusions Countries with the least restrictions fared best economically. Some of them fared well in terms of mortality, even better than neighboring countries with similar social structures and more severe restrictions. The mortality rates in the USA, however, appeared to suffer from very high obesity rates. Norway and the northern European countries have less strict restrictions from the rest of Europe and had lower mortality rates. COVID-19 mortality was associated with vitamin D status.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Exempt; large dataset analysis onlyAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is available as public datasets in our references 1 through 11.HVACheating, ventilation, and air conditioningCIConfidence IntervalINSEEInstitut national de la statistique et des études économiquesEUROMOMOEuropean Mortality Monitoring ProjectStatbelStatistics BelgiumUKUnited KingdomUSAUnited States of AmericaUVultraviolet lightGDPgross domestic productACair conditioningJRAIAJapan Refrigeration and Air Conditioning AssociationPprobability