TY - JOUR T1 - Estimation of incidence from aggregated current status data without differential mortality JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.05.28.21258004 SP - 2021.05.28.21258004 AU - Ralph Brinks Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/31/2021.05.28.21258004.abstract N2 - We use a historical data about breathlessness in British coal miners to compare two methods centered around a differential equation for deriving the age-specific incidence from aggregated current status data with age information, i.e. age-specific prevalence data. Special focus is put on estimating confidence bounds. For this, we derive a maximum likelihood (ML) estimator for estimating the age-specific incidence from the prevalence data and confidence bounds are calculated based on classical ML theory. Second, we construct a Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo (MCMC) algorithm to estimate confidence bounds, which implements a weighted version of the differential equation into the prior of the MCMC algorithm. The confidence bounds for both methods are compared and it turns out that the MCMC estimates approach the ML estimates if the prior gives strong weight to the differential equation.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialThis analysis is based on published data, which has been cited properly.Funding StatementThe author did not receive any funding for any aspect of this work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The analysis in this manuscript is based on publicly available data. The source is cited properly.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe source codes including the data sets for the analysis (and preparation of graphs) underlying this paper and for running the MCMC algorithm are available in the open public repository Zenodo. The links and DOIs are given in the manuscript. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4816749 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4770055 ER -