RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Age- and gender-dependent differences in attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination and underlying psychological processes
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.28.21257954
DO 10.1101/2021.05.28.21257954
A1 Tanaka, Toshiko
A1 Nihonsugi, Tsuyoshi
A1 Ohtake, Fumio
A1 Haruno, Masahiko
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/28/2021.05.28.21257954.abstract
AB The most promising way to prevent the explosive spread of COVID-19 infection is to achieve herd immunity through vaccination. It is therefore important to motivate those who are less willing to be vaccinated. To address this issue, we conducted an online survey of 6232 Japanese people to investigate age- and gender-dependent differences in attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination and the underlying psychological processes. We asked participants to read one of nine different messages about COVID-19 vaccination and rate their willingness to be vaccinated. We also collected their 17 social personality trait scores and demographic information. We found that males 10-20 years old showed the minimum willingness to be vaccinated. We also found that prosocial traits are the driving force for young people, but the motivation in older people also depends on risk aversion and self-interest. Furthermore, an analysis of 9 different messages demonstrated that for young people (particularly males), the message emphasizing the majority’s intention to vaccinate and scientific evidence for the safety of the vaccination had the strongest positive effect on the willingness to be vaccinated, suggesting that the herding effect arising from the “majority + scientific evidence” message nudges young people to show their prosocial nature in action.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPreparation of this manuscript was supported by CREST, JST, Moonshot R&D Grant Number JPMJMS2011, JST and KAKENNH (17H06314 and 20K21562) to M.H.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The NICT ethics committee approved all experimental procedures and informed consent was obtained from all participants.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.