@article {Hossain2021.05.19.21257413, author = {Md Mahbub Hossain and Nobonita Saha and Tahmina Tasnim Rodela and Samia Tasnim and Tasmiah Nuzhath and Tamal Joyti Roy and James N. Burdine and Helal Uddin Ahmed and E. Lisako J. McKyer and Banga Kamal Basu and Ping Ma}, title = {Global research on syndemics: A meta-knowledge analysis (2001-2020)}, elocation-id = {2021.05.19.21257413}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.05.19.21257413}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Syndemics or synergies of cooccurring epidemics are widely studies across health and social sciences in recent years. We conducted a meta-knowledge analysis of articles published between 2001 to 2020 in this growing field of academic scholarship. We found a total of 830 articles authored by 3025 authors, mostly from high-income countries. Publications on syndemics are gradually increasing since 2003, with rapid development in 2013. Each article was cited more than 15 times on average, whereas most (n = 604) articles were original studies. Syndemics research focused on several areas, including HIV/AIDS, substance abuse, mental health, gender minority stressors, racism, violence, chronic physical and mental disorders, food insecurity, social determinants of health, and COVID-19. Moreover, biopsychosocial interactions between multiple health problems were studied across medical, anthropological, public health, and other disciplines of science. The limited yet rapidly evolving literature on syndemics informs transdisciplinary interests to understand complex coexisting health challenges in the context of systematic exclusion and structural violence in vulnerable populations. The findings also suggest applications of syndemic theory to evaluate clinical and public health problems, examine the socioecological dynamics of factors influencing health and wellbeing, and use the insights to alleviate health inequities in the intersections of synergistic epidemics and persistent contextual challenges for population health.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding was received at any stage of conceptualizing or preparing this manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study used publicly available literature and did not involve any human subjects. Therefore, this study did not require any IRB approval.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData on materials used in this study can be found in the following public repository (https://osf.io/b4mvr/). https://osf.io/b4mvr/}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/22/2021.05.19.21257413}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/22/2021.05.19.21257413.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }