RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 High risk of patient self-inflicted lung injury in COVID-19 with frequently encountered spontaneous breathing patterns: a computational modelling study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.03.17.21253788
DO 10.1101/2021.03.17.21253788
A1 Liam Weaver
A1 Anup Das
A1 Sina Saffaran
A1 Nadir Yehya
A1 Timothy E. Scott
A1 Marc Chikhani
A1 John G. Laffey
A1 Jonathan G. Hardman
A1 Luigi Camporota
A1 Declan G. Bates
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/22/2021.03.17.21253788.abstract
AB Background There is on-going controversy regarding the potential for increased respiratory effort to generate patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI) in spontaneously breathing patients with COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure. However, direct clinical evidence linking increased inspiratory effort to lung injury is scarce. We adapted a computational simulator of cardiopulmonary pathophysiology to quantify the mechanical forces that could lead to P-SILI at different levels of respiratory effort. In accordance with recent data, the simulator parameters were manually adjusted to generate a population of 10 patients that recapitulate clinical features exhibited by certain COVID-19 patients, i.e. severe hypoxaemia combined with relatively well-preserved lung mechanics, being treated with supplemental oxygen.Results Simulations were conducted at tidal volumes (VT) and respiratory rates (RR) of 7 ml/kg and 14 breaths/min (representing normal respiratory effort) and at VT/RR of 7/20, 7/30, 10/14, 10/20 and 10/30 ml/kg / breaths/min. While oxygenation improved with higher respiratory efforts, significant increases in multiple indicators of the potential for lung injury were observed at all higher VT/RR combinations tested. Pleural pressure swing increased from 12.0±0.3 cmH2O at baseline to 33.8±0.4 cmH2O at VT/RR of 7 ml/kg/30 breaths/min and to 46.2±0.5 cmH2O at 10 ml/kg/30 breaths/min. Transpulmonary pressure swing increased from 4.7±0.1 cmH2O at baseline to 17.9±0.3 cmH2O at VT/RR of 7 ml/kg/30 breaths/min and to 24.2±0.3 cmH2O at 10 ml/kg/30 breaths/min. Total lung strain increased from 0.29±0.006 at baseline to 0.65±0.016 at 10 ml/kg/30 breaths/min. Mechanical power increased from 1.6±0.1 J/min at baseline to 12.9±0.2 J/min at VT/RR of 7 ml/kg/30 breaths/min, and to 24.9±0.3 J/min at 10 ml/kg/30 breaths/min. Driving pressure increased from 7.7±0.2 cmH2O at baseline to 19.6±0.2 at VT/RR of 7 ml/kg/30 breaths/min, and to 26.9±0.3 cmH2O at 10 ml/kg/30 breaths/min.Conclusions Our results suggest that the forces generated by increased inspiratory effort commonly seen in COVID-19 acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure are comparable with those that have been associated with ventilator-induced lung injury during mechanical ventilation. Respiratory efforts in these patients should be carefully monitored and controlled to minimise the risk of lung injury.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementUK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (grants EP/P023444/1 and EP/V014455/1).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NAAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesRequests for data and further details could be forwarded to d.bates{at}warwick.ac.uk