RT Journal Article SR Electronic T1 Predominance of the SARS-CoV-2 lineage P.1 and its sublineage P.1.2 in patients from the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre, Southern Brazil in March 2021: a phylogenomic analysis JF medRxiv FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press SP 2021.05.18.21257420 DO 10.1101/2021.05.18.21257420 A1 Vinícius Bonetti Franceschi A1 Gabriel Dickin Caldana A1 Christiano Perin A1 Alexandre Horn A1 Camila Peter A1 Gabriela Bettella Cybis A1 Patrícia Aline Gröhs Ferrareze A1 Liane Nanci Rotta A1 Flávio Adsuara Cadegiani A1 Ricardo Ariel Zimerman A1 Claudia Elizabeth Thompson YR 2021 UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/22/2021.05.18.21257420.abstract AB Almost a year after the COVID-19 pandemic had begun, The United Kingdom, South Africa, and Brazil became the epicenter of new lineages, the Variant of Concern (VOCs), B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and P.1, respectively. These VOCs are increasingly associated with enhanced transmissibility, immunity evasion, and mortality. The previous most prevalent lineages in the state of Rio Grande do South (Brazil), B.1.1.28 and B.1.1.33 were rapidly replaced by P.1 and P.2, two B.1.1.28-derived lineages harboring the E484K mutation. To perform a genomic characterization of SARS-CoV-2 samples from COVID-19 patients from the metropolitan region of Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul, Southern Brazil), in this second pandemic wave, we sequenced viral samples from patients of this region to: (i) identify the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 lineages in the region, the state and bordering countries/states, (ii) characterize the mutation spectra, and (iii) hypothesize possible viral dispersal routes by using phylogenetic and phylogeographic approaches. As results, we not only confirmed that 96.4% of the samples belonged to the P.1 lineage but also that approximately 20% of which could be assigned as the newer P.1.2 (a P.1 derived new sublineage harboring new signature substitutions recently described and present in other Brazilian states and foreign countries). Moreover, P.1 sequences from this study were allocated in several distinct branches (four clades and five clusters) of the P.1 phylogeny, suggesting multiple introductions of P.1 in Rio Grande do Sul still in 2020 and placing this state as a potential core of diffusion and emergence of P.1-derived clades. It is still uncertain if the emergence of P.1.2 and other P.1 clades are related to further virological, clinical, or epidemiological consequences. However, the clear signs of viral molecular diversification from recently introduced P.1 warrant further genomic surveillance.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by donations from Florense Brands, Beppler & Puppi Advogados, Smellbox Produtos de Higiene Ltda., and Dr. Leonardo Mestre Negri. Scholarships and Fellowships were supplied by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001 and Universidade Federal de Ciencias da Saude de Porto Alegre (UFCSPA). The funders had no role in the study design, data generation and analysis, decision to publish or the preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was obtained from the Brazilian's National Ethics Committee (Comissao Nacional de Etica em Pesquisa - CONEP) under process number CAAE 41909121.0.0000.5553 and Comite de Etica em Pesquisa em Seres Humanos da Universidade Federal de Ciencias da Saude de Porto Alegre (CEP - UFCSPA) under process number CAAE 35083220.2.0000.5345. The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients included in the clinical trial approved by CONEP were informed in detail about the study and gave written informed consent to participate. Samples were anonymized before being received by the study investigators, following Brazilian and international ethical standards.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesFull tables acknowledging the authors and corresponding labs submitting sequencing data used in this study can be found in Supplementary Files 3 and 4. Consensus genomes generated in this study were deposited in the GISAID database under Accession IDs: EPI_ISL_2139494 to EPI_ISL_2139549. Additional information used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. https://www.gisaid.org/