RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evolving Phenotypes of non-hospitalized Patients that Indicate Long Covid
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.25.21255923
DO 10.1101/2021.04.25.21255923
A1 Hossein Estiri
A1 Zachary H Strasser
A1 Gabriel A Brat
A1 Yevgeniy R Semenov
A1 The Consortium for Characterization of COVID-19 by EHR (4CE)
A1 Chirag J Patel
A1 Shawn N Murphy
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/21/2021.04.25.21255923.abstract
AB Many of the symptoms characterized as the post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) could have multiple causes or similarly seen in non-COVID patients. An accurate identification of phenotypes will be important to guide future research and the healthcare system to focus its efforts and resources on adequately controlled age- and gender-specific sequelae of COVID-19 infection. This retrospective electronic health records (EHR) cohort study, we applied a computational framework for knowledge discovery from clinical data, MLHO, to identify phenotypes that positively associate with a past positive PCR test for COVID-19. We evaluated the post-test phenotypes in two temporal windows at 3-6 and 6-9 months after the test and by age and gender. We utilized longitudinal diagnosis records stored in EHRs from Mass General Brigham (MGB) 57 thousand patients who tested positive or negative for COVID-19 and were not hospitalized. Statistical analyses were performed on data from March 2020 to March 2021. PCR test results and subsequent diagnosis records that were recorded for the first time two months or later after the PCR test. We identified 28 phenotypes among different age/gender cohorts or time windows that positively associated with a past SARS-CoV-2 infection. All identified phenotypes were newly recorded in patients’ medical records two months or longer after a COVID-19 PCR test in non-hospitalized patients regardless of the test result. Among these phenotypes, a new diagnosis record for anosmia and dysgeusia (OR 2.17, 95% CI [1.42 - 3.25]), alopecia (OR 3.54, 95% CI [2.92 - 4.3]), chest pain (OR 1.35, 95% CI [1.16 - 1.56]), or chronic fatigue syndrome (OR 1.81-2.28, 95% CI [1.38 - 3.68]) are the most significant indicators of a past COVID-19 infection, especially among women younger than 65. Among men, edema (OR 1.83, 95% CI [1.23 - 2.66]) and disease of nail (OR 3.54, 95% CI [1.63 - 7.29]) in patients 65 and older or proteinuria (OR 2.66, 95% CI [1.61 - 4.34]) in patients under 65 are associated with a positive COVID-19 PCR test in the past few months. Our approach avoids a flood of false positive discoveries, while offering a more probabilistic flexible criterion than the standard linear phenome-wide association study (PheWAS). These findings suggest that some of the previously identified post sequelae of COVID-19 may not be accurate and that most of the PASC are observed in patients under 65 years of age.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute grant 3U01HG008685-05S2 and the National Library of Medicine grant T15LM007092.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The use of clinical data in this study was approved by the MGB Human Research Committee with a waiver of informed consent.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData contains PHI and therefore is not publicly available.