TY - JOUR T1 - Modeling waning and boosting of COVID-19 in Canada with vaccination JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.05.18.21257426 SP - 2021.05.18.21257426 AU - Lauren Childs AU - David W Dick AU - Zhilan Feng AU - Jane M Heffernan AU - Jing Li AU - Gergely Röst Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/20/2021.05.18.21257426.abstract N2 - SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, has caused devastating health and economic impacts around the globe since its appearance in late 2019. The advent of effective vaccines leads to open questions on how best to vaccinate the population. To address such questions, we developed a model of COVID-19 infection by age that includes the waning and boosting of immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in the context of infection and vaccination. The model also accounts for changes to infectivity of the virus, such as public health mitigation protocols over time, increases in the transmissibility of variants of concern, changes in compliance to mask wearing and social distancing, and changes in testing rates. The model is employed to study public health mitigation and vaccination of the COVID-19 epidemic in Canada, including different vaccination programs (rollout by age), and delays between doses in a two-dose vaccine. We find that the decision to delay the second dose of vaccine is appropriate in the Canadian context. We also find that the benefits of a COVID-19 vaccination program in terms of reductions in infections is increased if vaccination of 15-19 year olds are included in the vaccine rollout.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was funded by the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada(JMH,DD), the CIHR-Fields COVID-19 Task Force (JMH,DD), NSF Grant # 2029262 (LMC), Hungarian Scientific Research Fund NKFIH FK 124016 (GR), NSF Grant DMS-1814545 (ZF), NSF IR/D program (ZF), and CSUN 2021-22 RSCA Awards (JL). The authors acknowledge the support of the American Institute of Mathematics (AIM) via workshop and SQuaRE grants.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:We followed all relevant ethical guidelines and a formal ethics approval was not needed for our modelling study.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data referred to in the manuscript is publicly available with the reference provided in the manuscript. ER -