RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 A multimodal biomarker predicts dissemination of bronchial carcinoid
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.17.21257308
DO 10.1101/2021.05.17.21257308
A1 E.M.B.P. Reuling
A1 D.D. Naves
A1 E. Thunnissen
A1 P.C. Kortman
A1 M.A.M.B. Broeckaert
A1 P.W. Plaisier
A1 C. Dickhoff
A1 J.M.A. Daniels
A1 T. Radonic
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/17/2021.05.17.21257308.abstract
AB Introduction The extensive loss of lung parenchyma is a drawback of anatomical resection in bronchial carcinoids. Endobronchial therapy (EBT) has emerged as a safe and effective minimally invasive tissue sparing alternative for small intraluminal tumors. Currently, therapeutic decision making in patients with bronchial carcinoid is mainly based on tumor morphology and patient characteristics. The availability of more accurate biomarkers might help clinicians in selecting low-risk tumors for EBT. Therefore, we investigated radiological (tumor diameter), morphometric (mitotic index) and immunohistochemical (OTP, CD44, Ki-67, Rb and P16) markers as predictors of dissemination.Material and methods Patients referred to Amsterdam University Medical Centers with available histology were included. Clinical and morphological characteristics relevant for classification such as tumor diameter, mitotic count (MAI) and prognostic immunohistochemical markers as Ki-67, P16, Rb, Orthopedia homebox (OTP) and CD44 were analyzed.Results In a cohort of 171 patients, the vast majority were curatively treated with either EBT (n=61, 36%) or surgery (n=103, 60%). Seven (4%) patients presented with distant metastases at diagnosis. TC was diagnosed in 112 (65%) and AC in 59 (35%) patients. Nine (15%) patients treated with EBT had a local recurrence of disease during follow up and none developed lymph node or distant metastasis. Of all surgically treated patients, 13 (13%) had level 1 or 2 lymph node metastases. Additional 13 (13%) patients developed distant metastases, 11 (85%) were AC and 2 (15%) TC. Patients with tumor stage IA (tumor diameter ≤1cm) irrespective of tumor classification or immunohistochemical results did not develop distant metastases. Patients with typical carcinoid (<2 mitoses per 2 mm2) stage ≥IB with Ki67 <5% and positive CD44 did not develop distant metastases either. All patients with atypical carcinoid (≥2 mitoses 2 mm2), Ki-67 of ≥5% (p=<0.000) and loss of CD44 (p=<0.0001) developed distant metastases. Tumors with stage ≥IB and either ≥2 mitoses, Ki-67 >5% or loss of CD44 metastasized occasionally (11%).Conclusion Adding tumor diameter, CD44 and Ki-67 to the widely used TC/AC classification, provides a multimodal biomarker that better stratifies patients in prognostically favorable and unfavorable categories than current standards. These findings enable risk stratification allowing a tailored treatment approach for patients with bronchial carcinoid.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was supported by a grant of ORAS (Oncological Research Albert Schweitzer Hospital).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Medical Ethics Review Committee of Amsterdam UMC IRB00002991All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, [EMBP Reuling], upon reasonable request. However, there might be restrictions e.g. containing information that could compromise the privacy of research