TY - JOUR T1 - COVID-19 Vaccine Intentions in the United States—December 2020 to March 2021 JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.05.16.21257290 SP - 2021.05.16.21257290 AU - Mark É Czeisler AU - Shantha MW Rajaratnam AU - Mark E Howard AU - Charles A Czeisler Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/17/2021.05.16.21257290.abstract N2 - Importance SARS-CoV-2 containment is estimated to require attainment of high (>80%) post-infection and post-vaccination population immunity.Objective To assess COVID-19 vaccine intentions among US adults and their children, and reasons for vaccine hesitancy among potential refusers.Design Internet-based surveys were administered cross-sectionally to US adults during December 2020 and February to March 2021 (March-2021).Setting Surveys were administered through Qualtrics using demographic quota sampling.Participants A large, demographically diverse sample of 10,444 US adults (response rate, 63.9%).Main Outcomes and Measures COVID-19 vaccine uptake, intentions, and reasons for potential refusal. Adults living with or caring for children aged 2 to 18 years were asked about their intent to have their children vaccinated. Multivariable weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios for vaccine refusal.Results Of 5256 March-2021 respondents, 3467 (66.0%) reported they would definitely or most likely obtain a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible (ASAP Obtainers), and an additional 478 (9.1%) reported they were waiting for more safety and efficacy data before obtaining the vaccine. Intentions for children and willingness to receive a booster shot largely matched personal COVID-19 vaccination intentions. Vaccine refusal (ie, neither ASAP Obtainers nor waiting for more safety and efficacy data) was most strongly associated with not having obtained an influenza vaccine in 2020 (adjusted odds ratio, 4.11 [95% CI, 3.05-5.54]), less frequent mask usage (eg, rarely or never versus always or often, 3.92 [2.52-6.10]) or social gathering avoidance (eg, rarely or never versus always or often, 2.65 [1.95-3.60]), younger age (eg, aged 18-24 versus over 65 years, 3.88 [2.02-7.46]), and more conservative political ideology (eg, very conservative versus very liberal, 3.58 [2.16-5.94]); all P<.001.Conclusions and Relevance Three-quarters of March-2021 respondents in our large, demographically diverse sample of US adults reported they would likely obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, and 60% of adults living with or caring for children plan to have them vaccinated as soon as possible. With an estimated 27% of the US population having been infected with SARS-CoV-2, once vaccines are available to children and they have been vaccinated, combined post-infection and post-vaccination immunity will approach 80% of the US population in 2021, even without further infections.Question What are COVID-19 vaccines intentions, for adults and for children under their care?Findings Two-thirds of 5256 US adults surveyed in early 2021 indicated they would obtain a COVID-19 vaccine as soon as possible. Intentions for children and booster vaccines largely matched personal vaccine intentions. Refusal was more common among adults who were younger, female, Black, very politically conservative, less educated, less adherent with COVID-19 prevention behaviors (eg, wearing masks), had more medical mistrust, or had not received influenza vaccines in 2020.Meaning Tailored vaccine promotion efforts and vaccine programs may improve vaccine uptake and contribute to US immunity against COVID-19.Competing Interest StatementMr Czeisler reported personal fees from Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. Dr Rajaratnam reported receiving grants and personal fees from Cooperative Research Centre for Alertness, Safety and Productivity, receiving grants and institutional consultancy fees from Teva Pharma Australia, and institutional consultancy fees from Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Circadian Therapeutics, BHP Billiton, and Herbert Smith Freehills. Dr Czeisler reported receiving grants and personal fees from Teva Pharma Australia, receiving grants from the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health R01-OH-011773, receiving personal fees from and equity interest in Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc, educational and research support from Philips Respironics Inc, an endowed professorship provided to Harvard Medical School from Cephalon, Inc, an institutional gift from Alexandra Drane, and a patent on Actiwatch-2 and Actiwatch-Spectrum devices with royalties paid from Philips Respironics Inc. Dr Czeisler's interests were reviewed and managed by Brigham and Women's Hospital and Partners HealthCare in accordance with their conflict of interest policies. Dr Czeisler also served as a voluntary board member for the Institute for Experimental Psychiatry Research Foundation, Inc. No other disclosures were reported.Funding StatementFunding for survey data collection was supported in part by research grants from the CDC Foundation (Atlanta, Georgia) with funding from BNY Mellon (New York, New York), and from WHOOP, Inc (Boston, Massachusetts), and Hopelab, Inc (San Francisco, California) to Monash University acting through its Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, and by institutional support from Philips Respironics Inc to Brigham & Women's Hospital, the Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, and Institute for Breathing and Sleep, Austin Hospital. Mr Czeisler gratefully acknowledges support from a 2020 Australian-American Fulbright Scholarship funded by The Kinghorn Foundation. Dr Czeisler is the incumbent of an endowed professorship provided to Harvard University by Cephalon, Inc. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Respondents provided informed electronic consent. The Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (Melbourne, Australia) reviewed and approved the protocol. Given exclusive recruitment of US residents in 2021, the Mass General Brigham Institutional Review Board (Boston, Massachusetts) also reviewed the protocol prior to the March-2021 wave and determined that this public health surveillance activity did not require institutional review board review.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified participant data can be made available by contacting the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Reuse is only permitted following a written agreement from the corresponding author and primary Institution. ER -