@article {Prete2021.05.10.21256644, author = {Carlos A. Prete, Jr and Lewis F. Buss and Claudia M. M. Abrahim and Tassila Salomon and Myuki A. E. Crispim and Marcio K. Oikawa and Renata Buccheri and Eduard Grebe and Allyson G. da Costa and Nelson A. Fraiji and Maria do P. S. S. Carvalho and Neal Alexander and Nuno R. Faria and Christopher Dye and V{\'\i}tor H. Nascimento and Michael P. Busch and Ester C. Sabino}, title = {Reinfection by the SARS-CoV-2 P.1 variant in blood donors in Manaus, Brazil}, elocation-id = {2021.05.10.21256644}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.05.10.21256644}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {The city of Manaus, north Brazil, was stricken by a severe epidemic of SARS-Cov-2 in March 2020, reaching a seroprevalence of 76\% by October 2020. Nevertheless, in late November an abrupt increase in hospitalizations and deaths hit Manaus, causing higher number of deaths compared to the first epidemic wave. It has been hypothesized that virus lineages circulating in the second wave, namely the P.1 variant of concern first detected in early December in Manaus, could be better at evading immunity generated in response to previous infection with other lineages.In order to estimate the reinfection rate during the resurgence of SARS-CoV-2 in Manaus, we tested serial samples from 238 unvaccinated repeat blood donors using a SARS-CoV-2 anti-N IgG chemiluminescence microparticle assay. Blood donors were divided into six groups that reflected the inferred sequence of infection and reinfection with non-P.1 and P.1 variants. We assumed that reinfections induce a recrudescence (or {\textquotedblleft}boosting{\textquotedblright}) of plasma anti-N IgG antibody levels, yielding a V-shaped time series of antibody reactivity levels.We infer that 16.9\% (95\% CI [9.48\%, 28.5\%]) of all presumed P.1 infections that were observed in 2021 were reinfections. If we also include cases of probable or possible reinfections (defined by considering the time period when the antibody levels are expected to grow after recovery and the range of half-lives for antibody waning after seroconversion), these percentages increase respectively to 25.8\% (95\% CI [16.7\%, 37.4\%]), and 31.0\% (95\% CI [21.4\%, 42.5\%]). Our data suggest that reinfection due to P.1 is common and more frequent than what has been detected by traditional epidemiologic, molecular and genomic surveillance of clinical cases.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis work was supported by the Itau Unibanco Todos pela Saude program and by a Medical Research Council-Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) CADDE partnership award (MR/S0195/1 and FAPESP 18/14389-0) (caddecentre.org/). Wellcome Trust and Royal Society (N.R.F. Sir Henry Dale Fellowship: 204311/Z/16/Z); the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study (REDS, now in its fourth phase, REDS-IV-P) for providing the blood donor demographic data for analysis (grant HHSN268201100007I). CAPJ was supported by FAPESP (2019/21858-0), Fundacao Faculdade de Medicina and Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior Brasil (CAPES), Finance Code 001. VHN was supported by CNPq (304714/2018-6).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This project was approved by the Brazilian national research ethics committee, CONEP CAAE - 397909020.9.1001.0009All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData can be shared upon request.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/12/2021.05.10.21256644}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/12/2021.05.10.21256644.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }