TY - JOUR T1 - Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Adoption and Compliance of the NHS COVID-19 Mobile Application: A National Online Questionnaire Survey in England JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.03.04.21252924 SP - 2021.03.04.21252924 AU - Marcus Panchal AU - Sukhpreet Singh AU - Esther Rodriguez-Villegas Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/12/2021.03.04.21252924.abstract N2 - Objectives To conduct an independent study investigating how adults perceive the usability, and functionality of the “NHS COVID-19” app. This study aims to highlight strengths, and provide recommendations to improve adoption of future contact tracing developments.Design A 60-item, anonymous online questionnaire, disseminated through social media outlets and email-lists by a team from Imperial College London.Setting EnglandParticipants Convenience sample of 1036 responses, from participants aged 18 and above, between December 2020 to February 2021.Primary Outcome Measures Evaluate the compliance and public attitude towards the “NHS COVID-19” app, regarding its functionality and features. This included whether participants expectations were met, and their thoughts on the app privacy and security. Furthermore, to distinguish how usability, perception, and adoption differed with varying demographics and user values.Results Fair app compliance was identified, with the app meeting expectations of 62.1% of participants who stated they downloaded it after weighted analysis. However, participants finding the interface challenging were less likely to read information in the app and had a lesser understanding of its functionality. Furthermore, lack of understanding regarding the app’s functionality and privacy concerns were possibly reasons why users did not download it. A readability analysis of the text revealed that app information was conveyed at a level which might only be accessible to under 60% of the population. The study highlighted issues related to the potential of false positives caused by the design choices in the “Check-In” feature.Conclusion This study showed that while the “NHS COVID-19” app was viewed positively, there remained issues regarding participants’ perceived knowledge of the app functionality, potentially affecting compliance. Therefore, we recommended improvements regarding the delivery and presentation of the app’s information, and highlighted the potential need for the ability to check out of venues to reduce the number of false positive contacts.Strengths and LimitationsThis is the first study assessing the perceived usability and functionality of the “NHS COVID-19” app directly from app users.Diverse sample size, with representation from all major regions of England.Statistical analysis to compare perceived app usability and functionality across demographics and the participants values regarding privacy and information.Study was conducted during lockdown where app use may have been minimal.Study may have missed potential participants who were not active on the relevant social media channels and email mailing lists which were used to disseminate the survey.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis project has received no funding. All the work has been done by the authors on a voluntary basis.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethical approval was provided by the Science Engineering Technology Research Ethics Committee of Imperial College.The approval number was, SETREC number: 20IC6427All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDue to restrictions in the ethics document, data beyond what is presented in this publication cannot be distributed. ER -