PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Caroline Skirrow
AU  - Steph Suddell
AU  - Liam Mahedy
AU  - Ian S. Penton-Voak
AU  - Marcus R. Munafò
AU  - Robyn E. Wootton
TI  - Psychosis-like experiences and cognition in young adults: an observational and Mendelian randomisation study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.05.06.21256771
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.05.06.21256771
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/10/2021.05.06.21256771.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/10/2021.05.06.21256771.full
AB  - Background Psychosis-like experiences (PLEs) are common and associated with mental health problems and poorer cognitive function. There is limited longitudinal research examining associations between cognition and PLEs in early adulthood.Aims We investigated the association of PLEs with different domains of cognitive function, using cross-sectional and longitudinal observational, and Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses.Method Participants from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) completed tasks of working memory at age 18 and 24, and tasks of response inhibition and facial emotion recognition at age 24. Semi-structured interviews at age 18 and 24 established presence of PLEs (none vs. suspected/definite). Cross-sectional and prospective regression analysis tested associations between PLEs and cognition (N=3,087 imputed sample). MR examined causal pathways between schizophrenia liability and cognition.Results The fully adjusted models indicated that PLEs were associated with poorer working memory performance (cross-sectional analyses: b=−0.18, 95% CI −0.27 to −0.08, p<0.001; prospective analyses: b=−0.18, 95% CI −0.31 to −0.06, p<0.01). A similar pattern of results was found for PLEs and response inhibition (cross-sectional analyses: b=7.29, 95% CI 0.96 to 13.62, p=0.02; prospective analyses: b=10.29, 95% CI 1.78 to 18.97, p=0.02). We did not find evidence to suggest an association between PLEs and facial emotion recognition. MR analyses were underpowered and did not support observational results.Conclusions In young adults, PLEs are associated with poorer concurrent and future working memory and response inhibition. Better powered genetically informed studies are needed to determine if these associations are causal.Competing Interest StatementMRM and IPV are co-directors of Jericoe Ltd, which produces software for the assessment and modification of emotion recognition. CS is employed by Cambridge Cognition. LM, REW and SS report no conflicts of interest.Funding StatementThe UK Medical Research Council and Wellcome (Grant ref: 217065/Z/19/Z) and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. A comprehensive list of grant funding is available on the ALSPAC website (http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). GWAS data was generated by Sample Logistics and Genotyping Facilities at Wellcome Sanger Institute and LabCorp (Laboratory Corporation of America) using support from 23andMe. Funding for access to ALSPAC data was provided by Cambridge Cognition. Additionally, this work was undertaken with the support of the UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit at the University of Bristol (MM_UU_00011/7). LM, REW, SS, and MRM are supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol (BRC-1215-20011). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. REW is supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the South-Eastern Regional Health Authority (2020024). LM is supported by the Elizabeth Blackwell Institute for Health Research, University of Bristol and the Wellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund (Grant ref: 204813/Z/16/Z).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. Written informed consent was obtained for the use of data collected via questionnaires and clinics from parents and participants following recommendations of the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee at the time. Consent for biological samples has been collected in accordance with the Human Tissue Act (2004). More details on ethics committees/institutional review boards are provided here: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/research-ethics/All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAny researcher can apply to use ALSPAC data, including the variables under investigation in this study. Access information is provided here: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/access/