RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Visual field improvement in neglect after virtual reality intervention: a case study
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.05.04.21256247
DO 10.1101/2021.05.04.21256247
A1 Michael Christian Leitner
A1 Stefan Hawelka
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/07/2021.05.04.21256247.abstract
AB Objective Studies on neuropsychological rehabilitation of visual field defects provide an inconsistent picture regarding the effectiveness of so-called “restorative approaches” in visual field recovery (VFR). During a current research project on the clinical evaluation of VFR - in combination with head mounted virtual reality displays (HMD) - a patient (“Patient 7”) suffering from visual neglect was investigated. Although the concept of VFR is originally not intended for patients suffering from higher cortical regions (as in neglect), we hypothesized that due to the strong attention-demanding training situation in HMDs, neglect patients might benefit from these intervention procedures based on restorative approaches.Methods and Analysis Patient 7 was examined perimetrically using a “Humphrey Field Analyzer”, “Goldmann Perimetry” and our newly developed and validated eye-tracking supported perimetric methodology “Eye tracking based visual field analysis” (EFA). Based on these high resolution results from the EFA, the exact location of the transition area between intact and defect visual field of Patient 7 was assessed. Next, bright light stimuli were placed along this area in our newly developed HMD “Salzburg Visual Field Trainer” (SVFT). The aim was to stimulate neuroplasticity - according to the concept of restitutive approaches - in the corresponding cortical areas of the patient. Patient 7 trained with the SVFT for a time period of 254 days. In 6 appointments the objective and subjective rehabilitation progress was assessed.Results Perimetric assessment with the EFA shows an expansion of Patient 7’s visual field of 48.8% (left eye) and 36.8% (right eye) after 254 days of training with the SVFT. Individual areas in the patient’s visual field show a visual improvement of approximately 5.5° to 10.5° of visual angle. Subjective self-report of Patient 7 additionally shows improvements in self-evaluation of up to 317% in visual field functionality compared to self-evaluation on the first assessment date.Conclusions The results from Patient 7 indicate that patients suffering from visual neglect potentially benefit from a neuropsychological intervention with HMD based on the restorative concept of visual field recovery. However, further studies with large case numbers and a focus both on daily-life improvements and on a clear distinction between patients with lesions in earlier and higher cortical areas are needed to make empirically valid and generalizing statements about our findings.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialDRKS00025205Funding StatementThe present study is based on the funded project "Advanced Perimetry for the Evaluation of Neuroplasticity in the Visual Cortex" by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (Reference No. P31299)Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The following study was reviewed and approved by the ethics commission of the University of Salzburg (Reference No. 39/2018)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request