PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Kenneth Cohen
AU  - David Anderson
AU  - Sheng Ren
AU  - David J. Cook
TI  - Does the elevated (thrombosis risk of males relative to females help account for the excess male mortality observed in Covid-19? An observational study
AID  - 10.1101/2021.05.04.21256001
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.05.04.21256001
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/04/2021.05.04.21256001.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/05/04/2021.05.04.21256001.full
AB  - Objectives We sought to determine whether underlying thrombophilia helps account for excess Covid-19 mortality rates in males relative to females. Specifically, we asked: What is the contribution of thrombophilia to the excess Covid-19 mortality risk among malesãDesign Cross-sectional observational study.Setting Data were sourced from electronic medical records (EMRs) drawn from over 200 US hospital systems.Participants 16,576 patients hospitalized with Covid-19, aged 40 and above.Main outcome measures The primary study outcome was Covid-19 mortality. We measured: 1) the mortality rate of male patients relative to female patients, 2) the rate of thrombotic diagnoses occurring during hospitalization for Covid-19 in male and female patients, and 3) the mortality rate when evidence of thrombosis was present. We used hospital EMR data to determine the rates of a thrombotic diagnosis by sex, and D-dimer levels to help identify undiagnosed thrombosis.Results The Covid-19 mortality rate of males was higher than that of females by 16.1%. Males with Covid-19 also had a 25.4% higher rate of receiving a thrombotic diagnosis compared to females with Covid-19. The mortality rate of all patients with a thrombotic diagnosis was 42.4%—a rate over twice that of Covid-19 patients without a thrombotic diagnosis (adjusted OR 2.4 (2.17 to 2.65), p-value < .001). When defining thrombosis as either a documented thrombotic diagnosis or markedly elevated D-dimer levels, over half of the excess mortality in male patients could be explained by thrombophilia.Conclusions Our findings suggest the higher Covid-19 mortality rate in males may be significantly accounted for by the increased propensity for thrombophilia among males. This thrombotic tendency is additive to the thrombotic risk associated with Covid-19. Understanding the mechanisms that underlie male thrombophilia may allow for the advancement of effective anticoagulation strategies that reduce Covid-19 mortality.Strengths and limitations of this studyTo our knowledge, this population study is the first to provide evidence of a sex-based clinical association that may help explain the excess Covid-19 mortality in males compared to females.This was an observational study using diagnosis codes and natural language processing (NLP) extractions of detailed electronic health record (EHR) data for 16,576 hospitalized patients with Covid-19.We evaluated underlying thrombosis based on both an inpatient thrombotic diagnosis as well as a markedly elevated D-dimer level relative to CRP level.A limitation of this study was that a portion of the estimated excess male mortality was based on the analysis of a subset of 3,442 patients that had serial D-dimer and CRP levels measured in the hospital, and that a potential undercount of these patients was possible due to the use of NLP.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementFunding: The study was funded by OptumLabs, the research and development arm of UnitedHealth Group, and the authors Drs. Cohen, Cook, Ren, and Mr. Anderson are full-time employees of UnitedHealth Group. These authors played an active role in all aspects of study development, including the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This manuscript was provided an IRB waiver as it was a retrospective analysis with all patient level data blinded. This was provided by the Office of Human Research Affairs at United Health Group, Emily Robison, Senior Regulatory ConsultantAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData availability statement: The data are not available for public use but, under certain conditions, may be made available to editors and their approved reviewers under a data-use agreement to confirm the findings of the current study.