RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Malaria awareness of adults in high, moderate and low transmission settings: A cross-sectional study in rural East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2020.12.04.20243675
DO 10.1101/2020.12.04.20243675
A1 Guntur, Robertus Dole
A1 Kingsley, Jonathan
A1 Islam, Fakir M. Amirul
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/30/2020.12.04.20243675.abstract
AB Introduction The Indonesian roadmap to malaria elimination in 2009 indicated that the nation is progressing towards achieve malaria elimination by 2030. Currently, most of the districts in the Western part of Indonesia have eliminated malaria, however, none of the districts in East Nusa Tenggara Province (ENTP) have met set targets. This study aims to investigate the status of malaria awareness of rural adults in the ENTP.Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between October and December 2019 in high, moderate, and low malaria endemic settings (MES) in ENTP. 1495 participants recruited by multi-stage sampling method were interviewed using a validated questionnaire, after obtaining informed consent. A malaria awareness index was developed based on ten questions. Logistic regression method was applied to investigate the significance of associations of malaria awareness with the three malaria endemic settings.Results Participants were between the age of 18 and 89 years old, 51.4% were female and 45.5% had completed primary education. Malaria awareness index was very low (48.8%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 45.2 – 52.4). Malaria awareness of rural adults residing in low endemic settings was three times higher compared to those were living in high endemic settings (Odds ratio (OR): 3.11, 95% CI: 2.40 – 4.03, p < 0.001) and the basic malaria knowledge for participants living in low malaria endemic setting was almost five times higher than that of in high endemic setting (OR: 4.66, 95% CI: 3.50 – 6.20, p < 0.001). Of total participants, 81.3% (95% CI: 79.1 – 83.5) were aware that malaria could be prevented and 75.1% (95% CI: 72.6 – 77.6) knew at least one prevention measure. Overall, the awareness of fever as the main symptom of malaria, mosquito bites as the transmission mode of malaria, and seeking treatment within 24 hours when suffering with malaria was poor, 37.9% (95% CI: 33.9 – 41.9), 59.1% (95% CI: 55.9 – 62.3), and 46.0% (95% CI: 42.3 – 49.7) respectively. The poor level of awareness was statistically significantly different amongst three MES, the level of awareness was the lowest in the high endemic setting.Conclusion Malaria awareness of rural adults needs to be improved to address Indonesia’s national roadmap to malaria elimination. Results indicate public health programs at a local government level should incorporate the malaria awareness index in their key strategic intervention packages to address local malaria awareness.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementPh.D. scholarship for RDG was supported by the Australia Awards Scholarship (ST000TBK6). The Faculty of Health, Arts and Design (FHAD) of Swinburne University Technology supported the primary data collection. The funders had no role in the design of the study, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of data or writing the manuscripts.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The research was conducted in accordance with the tenet of The Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by Human Ethics Committee of the Swinburne University of Technology (Reference: 20191428-1490) and from Health Research Ethics Committee, National Institute of Health Research and Development (HERC-NIHRD) the Indonesian Ministry of Health (Reference: LB.02.01/2/KE.418/2019)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData will be available after the article has been accepted to publish.