TY - JOUR T1 - Laser speckle contrast imaging for visualizing blood flow during cerebral aneurysm surgery: A comparison with indocyanine green angiography JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.04.29.21254954 SP - 2021.04.29.21254954 AU - David R. Miller AU - Ramsey Ashour AU - Colin T. Sullender AU - Andrew K. Dunn Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/29/2021.04.29.21254954.abstract N2 - Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) has emerged as a promising tool for intraoperative cerebral blood flow (CBF) monitoring because it produces real-time full-field blood flow maps non-invasively and label-free. In this study, we compare LSCI with indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) to assess CBF during aneurysm clipping surgery in humans. LSCI hardware was attached to the surgical microscope prior to the start of each surgery and did not interfere with the sterile draping of the microscope or normal operation of the microscope. LSCI and ICGA were performed simultaneously to visualize CBF in n=4 aneurysm clipping cases, and LSCI was performed throughout each surgery when the microscope was positioned over the patient. To more easily visualize CBF in real-time, LSCI images were overlaid on the built-in microscope white light camera images and displayed to the neurosurgeon in real-time. Blood flow changes before, during, and after an aneurysm clipping were visualized with LSCI and later verified with ICGA. LSCI was performed continuously throughout the aneurysm clipping process, providing the surgeon with immediate actionable information on the success of the clipping. The results demonstrate that LSCI and ICGA provide different, yet complementary information about vessel perfusion.Competing Interest StatementAuthors D.R.M and A.K.D. disclose a financial interest in Dynamic Light, Inc. in the form of holding stock, serving on the Board of Directors, and consulting. The terms of this arrangement have been reviewed and approved by the University of Texas at Austin in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.Clinical TrialID# 2018040045 from ClinicalTrials.govFunding StatementThis work was funded by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (EB011556).Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The clinical study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Texas at Austin. Written and informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to surgery.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).Yes I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDe-identified data upon request. ER -