RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Early and ongoing importations of SARS-CoV-2 in Canada
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.09.21255131
DO 10.1101/2021.04.09.21255131
A1 Angela McLaughlin
A1 Vincent Montoya
A1 Rachel L. Miller
A1 Gideon J. Mordecai
A1 Michael Worobey
A1 Art F. Y. Poon
A1 Jeffrey B. Joy
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/29/2021.04.09.21255131.abstract
AB Tracking the emergence and spread of SARS-CoV-2 is critical to inform public health interventions. Phylodynamic analyses have quantified SARS-CoV-2 migration on global and local scales1–5, yet they have not been applied to determine transmission dynamics in Canada. We quantified SARS-CoV-2 migration into, within, and out of Canada in the context of COVID-19 travel restrictions. To minimize sampling bias, global sequences were subsampled with probabilities corrected for their countries’ monthly contribution to global new diagnoses. A time-scaled maximum likelihood tree was used to estimate most likely ancestral geographic locations (country or Canadian province), enabling identification of sublineages, defined as introduction events into Canada resulting in domestic transmission. Of 402 Canadian sublineages identified, the majority likely originated from the USA (54%), followed by Russia (7%), India (6%), Italy (6%), and the UK (5%). International introductions were mostly into Ontario (39%) and Quebec (38%). Among Pango lineages6, B.1 was imported at least 191 separate times from 11 different countries. Introduction rates peaked in late March then diminished but were not eliminated following national interventions including restrictions on non-essential travel. We further identified 1,380 singleton importations, international importations that did not result in further sampled transmission, whereby representation of lineages and location were comparable to sublineages. Although proportion of international transmission decreased over time, this coincided with exponential growth of within-province transmission – in fact, total number of sampled transmission events from international or interprovincial sources increased from winter 2020 into spring 2020 in many provinces. Ontario, Quebec, and British Columbia acted as sources of transmission more than recipients, within the caveat of higher sequence representation. We present strong evidence that international introductions and interprovincial transmission of SARS-CoV-2 contributed to the Canadian COVID-19 burden throughout 2020, despite initial reductions mediated by travel restrictions in 2020. More stringent border controls and quarantine measures may have curtailed introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into Canada and may still be warranted.Significance Statement By analyzing SARS-CoV-2 genomes from Canada in the context of the global pandemic, we illuminate the extent to which the COVID-19 burden in Canada was perpetuated by ongoing international importations and interprovincial transmission throughout 2020. Although travel restrictions enacted in March 2020 reduced the importation rate and proportion of transmission from abroad across all Canadian provinces, SARS-CoV-2 introductions from the USA, India, Russia, and other nations were detectable through the summer and fall of 2020.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementAM was supported by a Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) Doctoral grant and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) CREATE scholarship. RLM was supported by an NSERC-CREATE scholarship. GM was supported by the Liber Ero Fellowship Programme. MW was supported by the David and Lucile Packard Foundation. AFYP was supported by a CIHR Project Grant PJT-156178. JBJ was supported by Genome Canada BCB 287PHY grant, an operating grant from the CIHR Coronavirus Rapid Response Programme number 440371, and a CIHR variant of concern supplement. The BC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS also provided support.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This research was exempt of IRB approval as it pertains to publicly available data.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll the viral genetic sequences and associated metadata used in this analysis are publicly available on GISAID, where open access to data is provided free-of-charge to all individuals that agreed to identify themselves and agreed to uphold the GISAID sharing mechanism governed through its Database Access Agreement. A list of included sequence identifiers is included in Appendix 1. The code can be shared upon request.