PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Emily Gard Marshall AU - Mylaine Breton AU - Benoît Cossette AU - Jennifer E Isenor AU - Maria Mathews AU - Caitlyn Ayn AU - Mélanie Ann Smithman AU - David Stock AU - Eliot Frymire AU - Lynn Edwards AU - Michael Green TI - The PUPPY Study – Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year AID - 10.1101/2021.04.09.21255161 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.04.09.21255161 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/28/2021.04.09.21255161.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/28/2021.04.09.21255161.full AB - Background The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted primary care in Canada, with many walk-in clinics and family practices initially closing or being perceived as inaccessible, pharmacies remaining open with restrictions on patient interactions, rapid uptake of virtual care, and reduced referrals for lab tests, diagnostics, and specialist care. The PUPPY Study seeks to understand the impact of COVID-19 across the quadruple aim of primary care, with particular focus on the impacts on patients without attachment to a regular provider and those with chronic health conditions.Objective The PUPPY Study objective is to understand the impact of COVID-19 across the quadruple aim of primary care.Methods The PUPPY study builds on an existing research program exploring patients’ access and attachment to primary care, pivoted to adapt to the emerging COVID-19 context. We will undertake a longitudinal mixed methods study to understand critical gaps in primary care access and coordination, comparing data pre- and post-pandemic in three Canadian provinces (Quebec, Ontario, and Nova Scotia). Multiple data sources will be used including: a policy review; qualitative interviews with primary care policymakers, providers (i.e., family physicians, nurse practitioners, and pharmacists), and patients (N=120); and medication prescribing and healthcare billings. The findings will inform the strengthening of primary care during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.Results Funding was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research COVID-19 Rapid Funding Opportunity Grant. Ethical approval to conduct this study was granted in Ontario (Queens Health Sciences & Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board, file number 6028052; Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, project 116591; University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, protocol number 40335), Québec (Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de l’Estrie, project number 2020-3446) and Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board, file number 1024979).Conclusions This is the first study of its kind exploring the impacts of COVID-19 on primary care systems, with particular focus on the issues of patient’s attachment and access to primary care. Through a multi-stakeholder, cross-jurisdictional approach, the PUPPY Study will generate findings and implications for future policy and practice.Competing Interest StatementDr. Green would like to acknowledge that the INSPIRE-PHC research program is supported by the Ontario Ministry of Health, which is supporting access to administrative data in Ontario.Funding StatementWe would like to acknowledge the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for their support to conduct this research in the form of a COVID-19 Rapid Funding Opportunity Grant.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval has been granted in Ontario (Queens Health Sciences & Affiliated Teaching Hospitals Research Ethics Board, #6028052; Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, #116591; University of Toronto Health Sciences Research Ethics Board, #40335), Quebec (Centre integre universitaire de sante et de services sociaux de l'Estrie, #2020-3446) and Nova Scotia (Nova Scotia Health Research Ethics Board, #1024979).All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesNo data associated with this study are available at time of development of this protocol.PUPPYProblems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year (current study title)NSNova Scotia (Canadian province)ONOntario (Canadian province)QCQuébec (Canadian province)CUPComparative analysis of centralized waitlist effectiveness, policies, and innovations for connecting unattached patients to primary care providers (study title)