RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Deprivation and Exposure to Public Activities during the COVID-19 Pandemic in England and Wales
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.26.21255732
DO 10.1101/2021.04.26.21255732
A1 Beale, Sarah
A1 Braithwaite, Isobel
A1 Navaratnam, Annalan M D
A1 Hardelid, Pia
A1 Rodger, Alison
A1 Aryee, Anna
A1 Byrne, Thomas
A1 Erica Fong, Wing Lam
A1 Fragaszy, Ellen
A1 Geismar, Cyril
A1 Kovar, Jana
A1 Nguyen, Vincent
A1 Patel, Parth
A1 Shrotri, Madhumita
A1 Aldridge, Robert W
A1 Hayward, Andrew
A1 on behalf of Virus Watch Collaborative
A1 Michie, Susan
A1 Wijlaars, Linda
A1 Nastouli, Eleni
A1 Spyer, Moira
A1 Killingley, Ben
A1 Cox, Ingemar
A1 Lampos, Vasileios
A1 McKendry, Rachel A
A1 Cheng, Tao
A1 Liu, Yunzhe
A1 Johnson, Anne M
A1 Gibbs, Jo
A1 Gilson, Richard
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/28/2021.04.26.21255732.abstract
AB Background Differential exposure to public activities and non-household contacts may contribute to stark deprivation-related inequalities in SARS-CoV-2 infection and outcomes, but has not been directly investigated. We set out to investigate whether participants in Virus Watch – a large community cohort study based in England and Wales – reported different levels of exposure to public activities and non-household contacts during the Autumn-Winter phase of the COVID-19 pandemic according to postcode-level socioeconomic deprivation.Methods Participants (n=20120-25228 across surveys) reported their daily activities during three weekly periods in late November 2020, late December 2020, and mid-February 2021. Deprivation was quantified based on participants’ postcode of residence using English or Welsh Indices of Multiple Deprivation quintiles. We used Poisson mixed effect models with robust standard errors to estimate the relationship between deprivation and risk of exposure to public activities during each survey period.Results Relative to participants in the least deprived areas, participants in the most deprived areas persistently exhibited elevated risk of exposure to vehicle sharing (aRR range across time points 1.73-8.52), public transport (aRR 3.13-5.73), work or education outside of the household (aRR 1.09-1.21), essential shops (aRR 1.09-1.13) and non-household contacts (aRR 1.15-1.19) across multiple survey periods.Conclusion Differential exposure to essential public activities in deprived communities is likely to contribute to inequalities in infection risk and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health interventions to reduce exposure during essential activities and financial and practical support to enable low-paid workers to stay at home during periods of intense transmission may reduce COVID-related inequalities.Competing Interest StatementAH serves on the UK New and Emerging Respiratory Virus Threats Advisory Group. The other authors declare no competing interests.Funding StatementThe research costs for the study have been supported by the MRC Grant Ref: MC_PC 19070 awarded to UCL on 30 March 2020 and MRC Grant Ref: MR/V028375/1 awarded on 17 August 2020. The study also received $15,000 of Facebook advertising credit to support a pilot social media recruitment campaign on 18th August 2020. Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The Virus Watch study was approved by the Hampstead NHS Health Research Authority Ethics Committee: 20/HRA/2320.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesWe aim to share aggregate data from this project on our website and via a "Findings so far" section on our website - https://ucl-virus-watch.net/. We will also be sharing individual record level data with personal identifiers removed on a research data sharing service such as the Office of National Statistics Secure Research Service. In sharing the data we will work within the principles set out in the UKRI Guidance on best practice in the management of research data. Access to use of the data whilst research is being conducted will be managed by the Chief Investigators (ACH and RWA) in accordance with the principles set out in the UKRI guidance on best practice in the management of research data. It is the intention that the data arising from this research will initially be collected, cleaned and validated by the UCL research team and once this has been completed will be shared for wider use. We aim to make subsets of the data more rapidly available both on our study website and via the public facing dashboard during the ongoing phase of data collection. In line with Principle 5 of the UKRI guidance on best practice in the management of research data, we plan to release data in batches as they become available or as updated results are published. Individual record data linked using NHS Digital will not be shared, only aggregated results. HES and mortality data may be obtained from a third party and are not publicly available. These data are owned by a third party and can be accessed by researchers applying to the Health and Social Care Information Centre for England. We will put analysis code on publicly available repositories to enable their reuse. https://ucl-virus-watch.net/