PT  - JOURNAL ARTICLE
AU  - Mazen Baroudi
AU  - Jon Petter Stoor
AU  - Hanna Blåhed
AU  - Kerstin Edin
AU  - Anna-Karin Hurtig
TI  - Men and sexual and reproductive healthcare in the Nordic countries: a scoping review
AID  - 10.1101/2021.04.20.21255777
DP  - 2021 Jan 01
TA  - medRxiv
PG  - 2021.04.20.21255777
4099  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/27/2021.04.20.21255777.short
4100  - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/27/2021.04.20.21255777.full
AB  - Context Men generally seek healthcare less often than women and, other than traditional gender norms, less is known about the explanation. The aim was to identify knowledge gaps and factors influencing men regarding sexual and reproductive healthcare (SRHC) in the Nordic countries.Methods We searched PubMed and SveMed+ for peer-reviewed articles published between 2010 and 2020. The analyses identified factors influencing men’s experiences of and access to SRHC.Results The majority of the 68 articles included focused on pregnancy, birth, infertility, and sexually transmitted infections including HIV. During pregnancy and childbirth, men were treated as accompanying partners rather than individuals with their own needs. The knowledge and attitudes of healthcare providers were crucial for their ability to provide SRHC and for the experiences of men. Organizational obstacles, such as women-centred SRHC and no assigned profession, hindered men’s access to SRHC. Lastly, the literature rarely discussed the impact of health policies on men’s access to SRHC.Conclusions The identified knowledge gap indicates the necessity of the improved health and medical education of healthcare providers, as well as of health system interventions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study was funded by the Public Health Agency of Sweden (Folkhalsomyndigheten). The Public Health Agency of Sweden was not involved in the analysis, interpretation, writing or the decision to submit this paper for publicationAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:No Ethical approval is neededAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe research has no primary collected data