%0 Journal Article %A Jean-Paul R. Soucy %A Amir Ghasemi %A Shelby L. Sturrock %A Isha Berry %A Sarah A. Buchan %A Derek R. MacFadden %A Nick Daneman %A Nicholas Gibb %A Kevin A. Brown %T Increased Interregional Travel to Shopping Malls and Restaurants in Response to Differential COVID-19 Restrictions in the Greater Toronto Area %D 2021 %R 10.1101/2021.04.23.21255959 %J medRxiv %P 2021.04.23.21255959 %X Background In the fall of 2020, the government of Ontario, Canada adopted a 5-tier, regional framework of public health measures for the COVID-19 pandemic. During the second wave of COVID-19 in Ontario, the urban core of the Greater Toronto Area (Toronto and Peel) were the first regions in the province to enter the highest restriction tier (“lockdown”) on November 23, 2020, which closed restaurants to in-person dining and limited non-essential businesses, including shopping malls, to curbside pickup. The peripheral regions of the Greater Toronto Area (York, Durham, Halton) would not enter lockdown until later the following month. In this analysis, we examine whether the implementation of differentially timed restrictions in a highly interconnected metropolitan area led to increased interregional travel, potentially driving further transmission of SARS-CoV-2.Methods We used anonymized smartphone data to estimate the number of visits by residents of regions in the urban core to shopping malls and restaurants in peripheral regions in the week before compared to the week after the November 23 lockdown.Results Residents of Toronto and Peel took fewer trips to shopping malls and restaurants in the week following lockdown. This was entirely driven by reductions in visits within the locked down regions themselves, as there was a significant increase in trips to shopping malls in peripheral regions by these residents in the same period (Toronto: +40.7%, Peel: +65.5%). Visits to restaurants in peripheral regions also increased slightly (Toronto: +6.3%, Peel: +11.8%).Discussion Heterogeneous restrictions may undermine lockdowns in the urban core as well as driving residents from zones of higher transmission to zones of lower transmission. These concerns are likely generalizable to other major metropolitan areas, which often comprise interconnected but administratively independent regions.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThis study received no external funding.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board through the Ontario COVID-19 Modelling Consensus Table, a provincial working group developing evidence for the COVID-19 response that operates with the support of the Ontario Ministry of Health, Ontario Health and Public Health Ontario.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe dataset used to support the conclusions of this paper is presented in Table 1. The time series presented in Figure 1 are available upon request. %U https://www.medrxiv.org/content/medrxiv/early/2021/04/26/2021.04.23.21255959.full.pdf