PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Suraj S Nongmaithem AU - Robin N Beaumont AU - Akshay Dedaniya AU - Andrew R Wood AU - Babatunji-William Ogunkolade AU - Zahid Hassan AU - Ghattu V Krishnaveni AU - Kalyanaraman Kumaran AU - Ramesh D Potdar AU - Sirajul A Sahariah AU - Murali Krishna AU - Chiara Di Gravio AU - Inder D Mali AU - Alagu Sankareswaran AU - Akhtar Hussain AU - Biswajit W Bhowmik AU - Abdul Kalam A Khan AU - Bridget A Knight AU - Timothy M Frayling AU - Sarah Finer AU - Caroline HD Fall AU - Chittaranjan S Yajnik AU - Rachel M Freathy AU - Graham A Hitman AU - Giriraj R Chandak TI - Associations of genetic scores for birth weight with newborn size and later Anthropometric traits and cardiometabolic risk markers in South Asians AID - 10.1101/2021.04.16.21254284 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.04.16.21254284 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/22/2021.04.16.21254284.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/22/2021.04.16.21254284.full AB - We recently reported genetic variants associated with birth weight and their effect on future cardiometabolic risk in Europeans. Despite a higher burden of low birth weight and cardiometabolic disorders, such studies are lacking in South Asians. We generated fetal and maternal genetic scores (fGS and mGS) from 196 birth weight-associated variants identified in Europeans and conducted association analysis with various birth measures and serially measured anthropometric and cardiometabolic traits from seven Indian and Bangladeshi cohorts. Although fGS and mGS were comparable to Europeans, birth weight was substantially smaller suggesting strong environmental constraints on fetal growth in South Asians. Birth weight increased by 50.7g and 33.6g per standard deviation fGS (P=9.1×10−11) and mGS (P=0.003) in South Asians. The fGS was further associated with childhood body size and head circumference, fasting glucose, and triglycerides in adults (P<0.01). Our study supports a common genetic mechanism partly explaining associations between early development and later cardiometabolic health in different populations, despite phenotypic and environmental differences.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementThe Pune Maternal Nutrition Study, Parthenon Study, Mumbai Maternal Nutrition Project and Mysore Birth Records Study were funded by the Medical Research Council (UK), Wellcome Trust (UK), Parthenon Trust (Switzerland) and Newton Fund. The GIFTS and London Bangladeshi cohorts were supported by the MRC [Clinical Research Training Fellowship (G0800441)] and the European Union (FP7 EU grant: 83599025). MMNP was supported by the Wellcome Trust, Parthenon Trust, ICICI Bank Ltd., Mumbai, the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) and the UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat. Childrens follow-up was funded by MRC (MR/M005186/1). MBRC studies were also supported by an early career fellowship to Murali Krishna by Welcome DBT India Alliance. Genotyping for the MMNP mother and children (The EMPHASIS study) is jointly funded by MRC, DFID and the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Ministry of Science and Technology, India under the Newton Fund initiative (MRC grant no.: MR/N006208/1 and DBT grant no.: BT/IN/DBT-MRC/DFID/24/GRC/2015-16). High throughput genotyping of the mother-child pairs from PMNS was funded through the GIFTS European Union (FP7 EU grant: 83599025); for all other cohorts, the genetic analysis was funded by the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research(CSIR), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India, through its Network projects. RMF and RNB are supported by Sir Henry Dale Fellowship (Wellcome Trust and Royal Society Grant: WT104150). Both authors would like to acknowledge the use of the University of Exeter High-Performance Computing (HPC) facility in carrying out this work. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under application number 7036. The Exeter Family Study of Childhood Health (EFSOCH) was supported by South West NHS Research and Development, Exeter NHS Research and Development, the Darlington Trust and the Peninsula National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Clinical Research Facility at the University of Exeter. The NIHR Exeter Clinical Research Facility is a partnership between the University of Exeter Medical School College of Medicine and Health, and Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. This project is supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Exeter Clinical Research Facility. The opinions given in this paper do not necessarily represent those of NIHR, the NHS or the Department of Health and Social Care. Genotyping of the EFSOCH study samples was funded by the Wellcome Trust and Royal Society grant 104150/Z/14/Z. The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, interpretation of data or writing of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:Institutional ethics committee of Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, provided the ethical approval for the study (IRB 45/2013). Ethical approval for the Exeter Family of Childhood Health was given by the North and East Devon (UK) Local Research Ethics Committee (approval number 1104), and informed consent was obtained from the parents of the newborns. GIFTS Dhaka Bangladeshi cohorts (WP2 and WP3) ISRCTN Number: 83599025 REC Reference:2013/845/REK sorost D Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics of Southern Norway, Section D REC Reference: May 7 2011. Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of the Diabetic Association of Bangladesh London UK Bangladeshi cohort (UK Bang) REC Reference: 12/LO/1418 National Research Ethics Service, London Hampstead REC Reference: 09/H0718/31 National Research Ethics Service, London RECAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesWeights for SNPs used in the genetic score were taken from Warrington et al. 2019 (Nat Genet 51, 804-814 (2019)). We used individual participant data for the association analysis from the PMNS, MMNP, PS, GIFTS, UKB and EFSOCH cohorts. Association summary statistics of genetic score with birth weight of all the cohorts are provided in the manuscript. Requests for access to the original dataset should be made in writing in the first instance for PMNS, PS, MMNP and MBRC to the Indian cohorts team leader Giriraj R Chandak at chandakgrc@ccmb.res.in For the original EFSOCH dataset to the EFSOCH data team via the Exeter Clinical Research Facility crf@exeter.ac.uk For GIFTS (WP2 & WP3) and UK Bang, to the GIFTS investigator team via Graham A Hitman g.a.hitman@qmul.ac.uk Full information on how to access the UK-biobank data can be found at - https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/using-the-resource/ [ukbiobank.ac.uk]