PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Radu Rozenberg AU - Niharika Shahi AU - Nishigandha Burute AU - Ahmed Kotb AU - Walid Shahrour AU - David Kisselgoff AU - Christian B. van der Pol AU - Anatoly Shuster TI - Assess the Benefit of Interventional Radiologist Performing an Image Guided Biopsy AID - 10.1101/2021.04.14.21255356 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.04.14.21255356 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/20/2021.04.14.21255356.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/20/2021.04.14.21255356.full AB - Purpose To determine whether there is any benefit in diagnostic accuracy, reduction in periprocedural complications, when image-guided biopsies are performed by interventional radiologist as compared to a general radiologist or other physician without prior special interventional training.Patients and Methods This study is a retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients that underwent imaging-guided core biopsies during one year in our hospital. Information collected included: patient age, gender, coagulation status, organ biopsied, imaging modality and equipment used, number of samples obtained, post-biopsy complications, histopathological results, and previous interventional training of a physician performing the biopsy. The quantitative data from patient charts was analyzed using a statistical program, Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).Results 449 patients were included in this study: 132 were performed using Computed Tomography guidance and 317 were performed under ultrasound guidance. The success rate of core biopsies was compared between different specialists, and was measured based on periprocedural complications, necessity of medical intervention and/or hospitalization after biopsy procedure, true positive histopathology results, and need to perform repeat biopsy of the same lesion owing to inconclusive results. Overall, IR had a success rate of 88.13%, non-IR had a success rate of 61.07%, and nephrologists had a success rate of 77.65%. The post biopsy complication rates were 5.48%, 27.52%, and 17.65% for procedures performed by IR, non-IR, and nephrologists respectively.Conclusion Our study shows an overall higher success rate and improved patient outcome when image guided biopsies were performed by IR, as compared to other non-IR physicians.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialRP-493-05042017Funding StatementNo funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The IRB approval number is: RP-493-05042017 Thunder Bay Research InstituteAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll study data are available from the corresponding author. Data will be shared in accordance with institutional research ethics board protocols https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1E7PlXr5Ccg0s4UEB4xWBfjtGaIFyTXvUTt3GxESp0bo/edit?ts=6025ef09#gid=1788355928