@article {Barrett2021.04.14.21255485, author = {Michael J Barrett and Stuart Dalziel and Mark Lyttle and Ronan O{\textquoteright}Sullivan and for the Pediatric Emergency Research Networks (PERN)}, title = {A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Networks}, elocation-id = {2021.04.14.21255485}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1101/2021.04.14.21255485}, publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press}, abstract = {Objective During the last three decades newly formed pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) research networks have been publishing research. A desire of these networks is to produce and disseminate research to improve patient health and outcomes. To quantitatively analyze and compare the literature by PEM research networks globally through numeric and visual bibliometrics.Methods A bibliometric analysis of articles published from 1994 to 2019 (26 years) by authors from PEM research networks globally were retrieved using PubMed{\textregistered}, Web of Science{\texttrademark} (Thompson Reuters) and accessing individual research network databases. Bibliometric analysis was performed utilizing Web of Science{\texttrademark}, VOSviewer and Dimensions. Research was quantified to ascertain the number of articles, related articles, citations and Altmetric attention score.Results A total of 493 articles were published across nine research networks in three decades. Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) produced the most articles, citations, and h-index of all networks. We identified three main groupings of productive authors across the networks who collaborate globally. The gender of the first author was female in 46\% of publications and the corresponding author(s) was female in 45\%. A non-significant moderate positive correlation between the number of years publishing and the number of publications was identified. There was non-significant moderate negative association between the number of countries in a network and total publications per annum.Conclusions This study is the first bibliometric analysis of publications from PEM research networks that collaborate globally. The gender gap in first authorship compared to high impact medical journals and high impact emergency medicine journals is narrower. Exploring the relationships of numerical bibliometric indicators and visualizations of productivity will benefit the understanding of the generation, reach and dissemination of PEM research within the global research community.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external or internal fundingAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This retrospective observational study did not involve human subjects, and ethical approval was not required.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.}, URL = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/20/2021.04.14.21255485}, eprint = {https://www.medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/20/2021.04.14.21255485.full.pdf}, journal = {medRxiv} }