RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Modulate fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity in Methamphetamine Users: A Randomized Clinical Trial
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.12.21255366
DO 10.1101/2021.04.12.21255366
A1 Hamed Ekhtiari
A1 Ghazaleh Soleimani
A1 Rayus Kuplicki
A1 Hung-Wen Yeh
A1 Yoon-Hee Cha
A1 Martin Paulus
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/19/2021.04.12.21255366.abstract
AB Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been studied as an adjunctive therapeutic option to alter maladaptive cortical excitability, activity, and connectivity associated with chronic substance use via the application of a weak direct current through the brain. The underlying mechanism of action remains ambiguous, however. We present a randomized, triple-blind, sham-controlled, clinical trial with two parallel arms conducted to determine the neural substrates of tDCS effects on drug craving using an fMRI drug cue reactivity paradigm. Sixty participants with methamphetamine use disorder were randomly assigned to two groups: 30 participants to active tDCS (5×7 cm2, 2 mA, for 20 minutes, anode/cathode over the F4/Fp1 in EEG 10-20 standard system) and 30 participants to the sham group. Neuroimaging data of a methamphetamine cue reactivity (MCR) task were collected immediately before and after stimulation with subjective craving assessed before, after, and during fMRI scans. There was a significant reduction in self-reported craving after stimulation (main effect of time) without any significant effect of group, time, or by group-time interaction. Our whole-brain analysis demonstrated that brain activation decreased in all parts of the brain in the second (post-stimulation) MCR imaging session after sham stimulation (habituation) but this uniform decrease did not occur throughout the brain in the active group. There were significant interactions between the group (active vs. sham) and time (after vs. before stimulation) in five main regions; medial frontal gyrus, anterior insula, inferior parietal lobule, precuneus, and inferior frontal gyrus with higher activations after active stimulation. We simulated computational head models for each individual. There was a significant effect of group in the relationship between level of current in the above-mentioned significant clusters and changes in task-modulated activation. We also found that brain regions with the highest electric fields in the prefrontal cortex showed a significant time by group interaction in task-modulated connectivity (psychophysiological interaction during MCR) in the frontoparietal network. In this two-parallel-arms triple-blind randomized control trial, we did not find any significant effect of the one session of active F4/Fp1 tDCS on drug craving self-report compared to sham stimulation. However, connectivity differences induced by active compared to sham stimulation suggested some potential mechanisms of tDCS to modulate neural response to drug cues among people with methamphetamine use disorder.No significant effect of active stimulation compared to sham was found in self-reported craving.Uniform habituation in response to drug cues happens only after the sham stimulation.MFG, IFG, insula, IPL, and precuneus show significantly higher responses to cues after active stimulation.Head models showed our stimulation montage (F4-Fp1) induces the highest level of current in rSFG.Cue reactivity modulated connectivity was significantly reduced by active stimulation between rSFG and rPPC.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Clinical TrialNCT03382379Funding StatementThis study is supported by internal funds at Laureate Institute for Brain Research to H.E. provided by Warren Family Foundation. There was no role for the funding agency in the design, execution, analysis or reporting this study.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:The study protocol was approved by the Western IRB (WIRB Protocol #20171742)All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesThe data and analysis codes that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The fMRI task and its codes are available in https://github.com/rkuplicki/LIBR_FDCR_Dynamic.