TY - JOUR T1 - Retinal implantation of electronic vision prostheses to treat retinitis pigmentosa: A systematic review JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2020.11.30.20234476 SP - 2020.11.30.20234476 AU - Luke E. Hallum AU - Steven C. Dakin Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/16/2020.11.30.20234476.abstract N2 - Purpose Retinitis pigmentosa is an hereditary disease causing photoreceptor degeneration and permanent vision loss. Retinal implantation of a stimulating electrode array is a new treatment for retinitis pigmentosa, but quantification of its efficacy is the subject of ongoing work. This review evaluates vision-related outcomes resulting from retinal implantation in participants with retinitis pigmentosa.Methods We searched MEDLINE and Embase for journal articles published since 1 January 2015. We selected articles describing studies of implanted participants that reported post-implantation measurement of vision. We extracted study information including design, participants’ residual vision, comparators, and assessed outcomes. To assess risk of bias, we used signalling questions and a target trial.Results Our search returned 425 abstracts. We reviewed the full text of 34 articles. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias due to study design or experimental conduct. Regarding design, studies lacked the measures that typical clinical trials take to protect against bias (e.g., control groups and masking). Regarding experimental conduct, outcome measures were rarely comparable before and after implantation, and psychophysical methods were prone to bias (subjective, not forced-choice, methods). The most common comparison found was between post-implantation visual function with the device powered off versus on. This comparison is at high risk of bias.Conclusions There is a need for high-quality evidence of efficacy of retinal implantation to treat retinitis pigmentosa.Translational Relevance For patients and clinicians to make informed choices about retinitis pigmentosa treatment, visual function restored by retinal implantation must be properly quantified and reported.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was received.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee provided exemption for this systematic reviewAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. ER -