RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Evaluating the impact of keeping indoor dining closed on COVID-19 rates among large US cities: a quasi-experimental design
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.12.21251656
DO 10.1101/2021.04.12.21251656
A1 Alina S. Schnake-Mahl
A1 Gabriella O’Leary
A1 Pricila H. Mullachery
A1 Vaishnavi Vaidya
A1 Gabrielle Connor
A1 Heather Rollins
A1 Jennifer Kolker
A1 Ana V. Diez Roux
A1 Usama Bilal
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/16/2021.04.12.21251656.abstract
AB Objective Indoor dining is one of the potential key drivers of COVID-19 transmission. We leverage the heterogeneity in state government preemption of city indoor dining closures, to estimate the impact of keeping indoor dining closed on COVID-19 incidence.Methods We obtained case rates and city/state re-opening dates from March to October 2020 in 11 U.S. cities. We categorized cities as (treatment) cities that were allowed by the state to reopen but kept indoor dining closed; and (comparison) cities that would have kept indoor dining closed but were preempted by their state and had to reopen indoor dining.Results Keeping indoor dining closed was associated with a 43% (IRR=0.57, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.69) decline in COVID-19 incidence over 4-weeks compared with cities that reopened indoor dining. These results were consistent after testing alternative modeling strategies.Conclusions Keeping indoor dining closed contributes to reductions in COVID-19 spread.Policy Implications Evidence of the relationship between indoor dining and COVID-19 incidence can inform state and local decisions to restrict indoor dining as a tailored strategy to reduce COVID-19 incidence.Competing Interest StatementASM was employed by, holds equity, and currently consults for CityblockFunding StatementThis study was funded with support from the NIH under grant DP5OD26429 and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation under grant RWJF 77644. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:In accordance with 45 CFR 46, institutional review board approval and informed consent were not required because all data was publicly available and deidentified.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesData is from the BCHC COVID-19 Health Inequities in Cities dashboard and from the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University publicly available from the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University. https://github.com/CSSEGISandData/COVID-19