TY - JOUR T1 - Seroepidemiology among Employees of New York City Health and Hospitals during the First Wave of the SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic JF - medRxiv DO - 10.1101/2021.04.12.21255344 SP - 2021.04.12.21255344 AU - Alexander D. Bryan AU - Kathleen Tatem AU - Jillian Diuguid-Gerber AU - Caroline Cooke AU - Anya Romanoff AU - Nandini Choudhury AU - Michael Scanlon AU - Preeti Kishore AU - Elana Sydney AU - Joseph Masci AU - Parampreet Bakshi AU - Sahithi Pemmasani AU - Nichola J. Davis AU - Duncan Maru Y1 - 2021/01/01 UR - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/15/2021.04.12.21255344.abstract N2 - Objective Estimate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among New York City Health + Hospitals healthcare workers, and identify demographic and occupational factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers.Methods This was an observational, cross-sectional study using data from SARS-CoV-2 serological tests accompanied by a demographic and occupational survey administered to healthcare workers. Participants were employed by New York City Health + Hospitals (NYC H+H) and either completed serologic testing at NYC H+H between April 30 and June 30, 2020, or completed SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing outside of NYC H+H and were able to self-report results.Results Seven hundred twenty-seven survey respondents were included in analysis. Participants had a mean age of 46 years (SD= 12.19) and 543 (75%) were women. Two hundred fourteen (29%) participants tested positive or reported testing positive for the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (IgG+). Characteristics associated with positive SARS-CoV-2 serostatus were Black race (25% IgG+ vs. 15% IgG-, p=0.001), having someone in the household with COVID symptoms (49% IgG+ vs. 21% IgG-, p<0.001), or having a confirmed COVID-19 case in the household (25% IgG+ vs 5% IgG-, p<0.001). Characteristics associated with negative SARS-CoV-2 serostatus included working on a COVID patient floor (27% IgG+ vs. 36% IgG-, p=0.02), working in the ICU (20% IgG+ vs. 28% IgG-, p=0.03), or having close contact with a patient with COVID-19 (51% IgG+ vs. 62% IgG-, p=0.03).Conclusions Results underscore the significance of community factors and inequities might have on SARS-CoV-2 exposure for healthcare workers.What is already known about this subject?Healthcare workers are at risk of occupational transmission of SARS-CoV-2, and the risk of infection varies by demographic characteristics and work location.What are the new findings?Healthcare worker race and household contacts were significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity, while working on a COVID patient floor or ICU was associated with seronegativity.How might this impact on policy or clinical practice in the foreseeable future?Results underscore the significance of community factors and inequities on healthcare worker exposure to SARS-CoV-2, and the need to address these inequities at the community level where healthcare workers live.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo funding disclosuresAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Biomedical Research Alliance of New York.All necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesDeidentified data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author. ER -