PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Tawan Jamdee AU - Christopher Foster AU - Courtney K. Rowe AU - Kelly A. Burke TI - Material properties of urethral stents for hypospadias repair AID - 10.1101/2021.04.06.21254967 DP - 2021 Jan 01 TA - medRxiv PG - 2021.04.06.21254967 4099 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/09/2021.04.06.21254967.short 4100 - http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/09/2021.04.06.21254967.full AB - Introduction Despite the prevalence of hypospadias surgery and the near ubiquitous use of postoperative urethral stents, there has been no evaluation of the material properties of commonly used choices. Our study sets out to close this gap with an evaluation and comparison of the material properties of four urethral stents commonly used after hypospadias surgery.Study Design Thermal analysis and mechanical analysis of the Zaontz Urethral Stent, the Firlit-Kluge Urethral Stent, the Koyle Diaper Stent, and the Bard Premature Infant Feeding Tube were performed.Results Thermal analysis shows that all four compositions tested are rubbery polymers at body temperature, with glass transition temperatures far below human body temperatures. The Zaontz and Koyle stents are thermoplastic elastomers with strong melting transitions above body temperature, but the Firlit-Kluge stent is completely amorphous at body temperature and is likely chemically cross-linked to generate the polymer network. The Bard feeding tube was by far the stiffest, with a Young’s Modulus of 14.0± 0.78 (compared to the Zaontz stent at 4.12 ± 0.56, the Firlit-Kluge stent at 4.92± 0.63, and the Koyle stent at 4.09± 0.49.) The Firlit-Kluge stent was the strongest, with 84.3± 2.83 MPa required to fracture it compared to the Zaontz stent at 65.5 ± 2.57, the Koyle stent at 66.8± 3.16, and then Bard feeding tube at 34.6± 1.89.Discussion While there is little information associating urethral stent type with outcomes after hypospadias surgery, material properties may account for findings of prior studies. Stiffer stents may contribute to decreased postoperative comfort, while a stent that is too soft and extensible may have issues with dislodgement, kinking and breaking.Conclusion This study provides a foundation for future work optimizing urethral stents, designing support for regenerative medicine applications, and improving hypospadias outcomes.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNoneAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:NAAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesIf requested, data and material samples will be made available for sharing to qualified parties as determined by the PI, as long as such a request does not compromise intellectual property interests, interfere with publication, or precede data curation.