RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Network assessment and modeling the management of an epidemic on a college campus with testing, contact tracing, and masking
JF medRxiv
FD Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
SP 2021.04.06.21255015
DO 10.1101/2021.04.06.21255015
A1 Gregg Hartvigsen
YR 2021
UL http://medrxiv.org/content/early/2021/04/09/2021.04.06.21255015.abstract
AB There remains a great challenge to minimize the spread of epidemics. This may be particularly true on densely populated, residential college campuses. To construct class and residential networks I used data from a four-year, residential liberal arts college with 5539 students. Equal-sized random networks also were created for each day. Different levels of compliance with mask use (none to 100%), mask efficacy (50% to 100%), and testing frequency (daily, or every 2, 3, 7, 14, 28, or 105 days) were assessed. Tests were assumed to be only 90% accurate and positive results were used to isolate individuals. I also tested the effectiveness of contact tracing and subsequent quarantining of neighbors of infectious individuals.I used class enrollment and residence data from a college with 5539 students to analyze network structure and test the epidemic potential of the infectious disease agent SARS-CoV-2. Average path lengths were longer in the college networks compared to random networks. Students in larger majors generally had shorter average path lengths. Average transitivity (clustering) was lower on days when students most frequently were in class (MWF). Degree distributions were generally large and right skewed, ranging from 0 to 719.Simulations began by inoculating twenty students (10 exposed and 10 infectious) with SARS-CoV-2 on the first day of the fall semester and ended once the disease was cleared. Transmission probability was calculated based on an R0 = 2.4. Without interventions epidemics resulted in most students becoming infected and lasted into the second semester. On average students in the college networks experienced fewer infections, shorter duration, and lower epidemic peaks that occurred compared to dynamics on equal-sized random networks. The most important factors in reducing case numbers were the proportion masking and the frequency of testing, followed by contact tracing and mask efficacy. The paper discusses further high-order interactions and other implications of non-pharmaceutical interventions for disease transmission on a residential college campus.[Model and network data files are available at https://github.com/GreggHartvigsen/Network-epidemic-model-college-campus]Author summary I built and analyzed daily networks for a college with 5539 students based on class enrollment and residence data over two academic semesters (fall 2019 - spring 2020). I then introduced an infectious disease agent similar to SARS-CoV-2 and tested a variety of non-pharmaceutical interventions to minimize the spread. The structure of these networks actually resulted in fewer students becoming infected when compared to random networks. Most important, however, was the level of masking and testing that was used to mitigate the spread. I found that with moderate levels of testing and contact tracing and/or masking the number of COVID-19 cases was well contained. Without any of these non-pharmaceutical interventions most students contracted COVID-19. Additionally, larger majors were at a slightly elevated level of risk of infection and students in classes over 40 students also were at a great risk of infection. The results suggest that college campuses should be able to contain infectious diseases, such as COVID-19, through the effective use of moderate levels of masking and testing, with resulting isolation of infectious individuals.Competing Interest StatementThe authors have declared no competing interest.Funding StatementNo external funding was receivedAuthor DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:All ethical guidelines have been followedAll necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.YesAll data files (networks) and the model are provided on GitHub https://github.com/GreggHartvigsen/Network-epidemic-model-college-campus